NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Salisbury, Jason; Goff, Peter; Blitz, Mark – Journal of School Leadership, 2019
Initiatives to increase leadership accountability coupled with efforts to promote data-driven leadership have led to widespread adoption of instruments to assess school leaders. In this article, we present a decision matrix that practitioners and researchers can use to facilitate instrument selection. Our decision matrix focuses on the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response), Accountability, Instructional Leadership
Erwin, Susan; Winn, Pam; Gentry, Jim; Cauble, Mary – Online Submission, 2010
Because of the importance of developing highly skilled school leaders, statewide assessments of 784 Texas public school administrators were compared to determine how leadership skills varied by type of campus (urban, suburban and rural) and by campus student achievement ratings. Important findings indicate differences exist by campus type and by…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Suburban Schools, Rural Schools, Comparative Analysis
Wills, Lewis A. – 1976
In this review of current practices it is observed that administrators are evaluated for two major purposes--(1) to provide a basis for school districts' decisions at the conclusion of the evaluation period, and (2) to provide feedback on performance to allow administrator improvement. A comparison is made of evaluation material from five school…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Administrator Role
Hoyt, Donald P.; Spangler, Ronald K. – 1977
In a study of administrative effectiveness, a total of 103 academic department heads in four universities rated a set of 15 administrative activities as to their importance. Faculty members in the 1,333 departments used the same set of activities to rate both the importance they should be given by the department head and the effectiveness with…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Responsibility, College Faculty
Thomas, Wanda E. – 1980
A national survey of community college department chairpersons was conducted in 1978 to determine: (1) the purposes, procedures, criteria, and standards used to evaluate their administrative performance; (2) their opinions about the present and the desirable components of chairperson appraisal systems; and (3) how chairpersons from various…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Community Colleges, Comparative Analysis, Department Heads
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Holloway, Mary Louise – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1988
Reviews general facets of performance appraisal pointing out the similarities and differences in methods and instruments used to assess the performance of administrative, academic, and nonacademic personnel. Relates the concepts of merit pay and tenure to performance appraisal. (DMM)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, College Administration, Community Colleges, Comparative Analysis
Edington, John M., III; Enger, John M. – 1992
This study examined evaluation processes used by Arkansas school boards to evaluate their superintendents, and compared the data with results from a recent national survey reporting techniques used in the evaluation of superintendents, data about who had input in conducting the evaluation, criteria used in the evaluation process, and traits of an…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Boards of Education, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education