NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
School Psychology and Computerized Data Handling Systems: A Confrontation.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nolen, Patricia; Spencer, Michael – Computers in the Schools, 1986
School psychologists and education students and faculty were asked to distinguish between computer-generated and individually written psychological test comments and indicate cues used in making identifications. Even though results indicate correct identification did not differ significantly from chance, school assessment reports must provide more…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software
Computer Learning and Appropriate Testing: A First Step in Validity Assessment.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baird, William E.; Silvern, Steven B. – Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 1992
Describes a study of college students that investigated the interaction between instructional mode and testing mode. Computer learning and testing versus paper-and-pencil methods are compared, and treatments for the experimental and control groups are described. Areas for further research are suggested. (20 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing
Comparability of a Paper-Based Language Test and a Computer-Based Language Test.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Choi, Inn-Chull; Kim, Kyoung Sung; Boo, Jaeyool – Language Testing, 2003
Utilizing the Test of English Proficiency, developed by Seoul National University (TEPS), examined comparability between the paper-based language test and the computer-based language test based on content and construct validation employing content analyses based on corpus linguistic techniques in addition to such statistical analyses as…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computational Linguistics, Computer Assisted Testing
Comparisons of Paper-Administered, Computer-Administered and Computerized Adaptive Achievement Tests.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Olsen, James B.; And Others – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1989
Describes study that was designed to compare student achievement scores from three different testing methods: paper-administered testing, computer-administered testing, and computerized adaptive testing. The California Assessment Program (CAP) item banks for grades three and six which this study incorporated are described, and results are…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis
Computer Literacy Skills among School Students and Employees in Industry.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harrison, C.; And Others – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1992
Describes the Technical Literacy Project which was developed at the University of Nottingham to examine and compare the computer literacy skills of graduating secondary school students and industry workers. The use of Macintosh computers and HyperCard software is explained; gender differences are examined; and results showing better performances…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Literacy
CMI Unit Test Item Presentation/Feedback and Its Effect on Final Examination Performance: Staff Study.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jelden, D. L. – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1988
Reviews study conducted to compare levels of achievement on final exams for college students responding to combinations of test-item feedback methods and modes of test-item presentation. The PHOENIX computer system used in the comparison is described, and the use of ACT (American College Testing Program) scores for ability comparison is discussed.…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Analysis of Covariance