Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Benchmarking | 6 |
Comparative Analysis | 6 |
Control Groups | 6 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Computation | 2 |
Experimental Groups | 2 |
Questionnaires | 2 |
School Districts | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Advanced Students | 1 |
Capacity Building | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 1 |
Evaluation Review | 1 |
International Review of… | 1 |
Marketing Education Review | 1 |
Online Submission | 1 |
Society for Research on… | 1 |
Author
Agu, Agu G. | 1 |
Anderson, Kaitlin | 1 |
Bardel, Camilla | 1 |
Gaus, Hansjoerg | 1 |
Gudmundson, Anna | 1 |
Henry, Gary T. | 1 |
Lindqvist, Christina | 1 |
Miller, Trey | 1 |
Mueller, Christoph Emanuel | 1 |
Okpara, Gazie S. | 1 |
Steele, Jennifer | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Nigeria | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Okpara, Gazie S.; Agu, Agu G. – Marketing Education Review, 2017
Nonregular higher education in Nigeria became an integral part of the university manpower development since 1960, when the Ashby Commission recommended establishing evening degree programs. These ubiquitous programs have contributed to national capacity-building and remain relatively unmonitored by the National Universities Commission. This…
Descriptors: Marketing, Educational Quality, Governance, Universities
Zamarro, Gema; Anderson, Kaitlin; Steele, Jennifer; Miller, Trey – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2016
The purpose of this study is to study the performance of different methods (inverse probability weighting and estimation of informative bounds) to control for differential attrition by comparing the results of different methods using two datasets: an original dataset from Portland Public Schools (PPS) subject to high rates of differential…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Student Attrition, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Mueller, Christoph Emanuel; Gaus, Hansjoerg – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
In this article, we test an alternative approach to creating a counterfactual basis for estimating individual and average treatment effects. Instead of using control/comparison groups or before-measures, the so-called Counterfactual as Self-Estimated by Program Participants (CSEPP) relies on program participants' self-estimations of their own…
Descriptors: Intervention, Research Design, Research Methodology, Program Evaluation
Lindqvist, Christina; Bardel, Camilla; Gudmundson, Anna – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 2011
This study investigates Swedish learners' lexical richness in French and Italian L2. A frequency-based measure was used to compare the lexical richness of learners at different proficiency levels to that of native speakers. Frequency bands based on oral L1 data were created for both languages to serve as a benchmark. For French, the results show…
Descriptors: Control Groups, French, Italian, Native Speakers
Waldron, Chad H. – Online Submission, 2008
The research study examined whether a difference existed between the reading achievement scores of an experimental group and a control group in standardized reading achievement. This difference measured the effect of systematic oral reading fluency instruction with repeated readings. Data from the 4Sight Pennsylvania Benchmark Reading Assessments…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Reading Fluency, Reading Achievement

Henry, Gary T.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1992
A statistical technique is presented for developing performance standards based on benchmark groups. The benchmark groups are selected using a multivariate technique that relies on a squared Euclidean distance method. For each observation unit (a school district in the example), a unique comparison group is selected. (SLD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Benchmarking, Comparative Analysis, Control Groups