Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Educational Psychology | 1 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychology Learning and… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Books | 1 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Seifried, Eva; Lenhard, Wolfgang; Spinath, Birgit – Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2015
Essays that are assigned as homework in large classes are prone to cheating via unauthorized collaboration. In this study, we compared the ability of a software tool based on Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) and student teaching assistants to detect plagiarism in a large group of students. To do so, we took two approaches: the first approach was…
Descriptors: Plagiarism, Cheating, Essays, Homework
Jacobs, Lucy Cheser; Chase, Clinton I. – 1992
This book offers specific how-to advice to college faculty on every stage of the testing process, including planning the test and classifying objectives to be measured, ensuring the validity and reliability of the test, and grading in such a way as to arrive at fair grades based on relevant data. The book examines the strengths and weaknesses of…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
