NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sarikaya, Özge; Denis-Çeliker, Huriye – International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2022
The purpose of this study is to examine the trends in recent years by focusing on the bibliometric results of previous studies on scientific creativity. For this purpose, a total of 370 publications on scientific creativity obtained from Web of Science and Scopus databases were examined in terms of different bibliometric variables, and they were…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Creativity, Databases, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Klopfenstein, D. V.; Dampier, Will – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
We read with considerable interest the study by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (Gusenbauer and Haddaway, 2020, Research Synthesis Methods, doi:10.1002/jrsm.1378) comparing the systematic search qualities of 28 search systems, including Google Scholar (GS) and PubMed. Google Scholar and PubMed are the two most popular free academic search tools in biology…
Descriptors: Search Engines, Search Strategies, Databases, Information Retrieval
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rogers, Morwenna; Bethel, Alison; Briscoe, Simon – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Background: Forwards citation searching is a valuable method for finding relevant studies in reviews where concepts are not clearly defined. Scopus and Web of Science can both be used for forwards citation searching but there is little evidence comparing the resources for this purpose. Method: 104 source records relevant to a scoping review of…
Descriptors: Dementia, Search Strategies, Citations (References), Research Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cristia, Alejandrina; Bulgarelli, Federica; Bergelson, Elika – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2020
Purpose: The Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system provides automated measures facilitating clinical and nonclinical research and interventions on language development, but there are only a few, scattered independent reports of these measures' validity. The objectives of the current systematic review were to (a) discover studies comparing…
Descriptors: Intervention, Measures (Individuals), Language Acquisition, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Biocic, Marina; Fidahic, Mahir; Cikes, Karla; Puljak, Livia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Background: It has been reported that information sources searched in systematic reviews (SRs) are insufficiently comprehensive. We analyzed information sources used in SRs, as well as how up-to-date were the searches. Methods: We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) through Wiley from 2012 to 2016 to find SRs of…
Descriptors: Pain, Case Studies, Anesthesiology, Databases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Waffenschmidt, Siw; Guddat, Charlotte – Research Synthesis Methods, 2015
Background: It is unclear which terms should be included in bibliographic searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drugs, and identifying relevant drug terms can be extremely laborious. The aim of our analysis was to determine whether a bibliographic search using only the generic drug name produces sufficient results for the generation…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Drug Therapy, Outcomes of Treatment, Databases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dilger, Alexander; Müller, Harry – European Journal of Higher Education, 2013
Rankings of academics can be constructed in two different ways, either based on journal rankings or based on citations. Although citation-based rankings promise some fundamental advantages they are still not common in German-speaking business administration. However, the choice of the underlying database is crucial. This article argues that for…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, German, Business Administration, Databases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gilmour, Ron; Cobus-Kuo, Laura – Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2011
Reference management (RM) software is widely used by researchers in the health and natural sciences. Librarians are often called upon to provide support for these products. The present study compares four prominent RMs: CiteULike, RefWorks, Mendeley, and Zotero, in terms of features offered and the accuracy of the bibliographies that they…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Computer Software, Citations (References), Bibliographies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kranzler, John H.; Grapin, Sally L.; Daley, Matt L. – Journal of School Psychology, 2011
This study examined the research productivity and scholarly impact of faculty in APA-accredited school psychology programs using data in the PsycINFO database from 2005 to 2009. We ranked doctoral programs on the basis of authorship credit, number of publications, and number of citations. In addition, we examined the primary publication outlets of…
Descriptors: Productivity, Doctoral Programs, School Psychology, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pollard, Richard – Electronic Library, 1986
Discusses criteria for evaluating microcomputer database management systems (DBMS) used for storage and retrieval of bibliographic data. Two popular types of microcomputer DBMS--file management systems and relational database management systems--are evaluated with respect to these criteria. (Author/MBR)
Descriptors: Citations (References), Classification, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Middleton, Michael R.; Di'Orio, Aurora – Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 1984
References indexed for Australian Education Index (AEI) were sampled and compared where possible with same references indexed for ERIC and Australian Public Affairs Information Service (APAIS) databases. An analysis of coverage of Australian references reveals indexing consistency figures of 22 percent for ERIC/AEI and 18 percent for AEI/APAIS.…
Descriptors: Citations (References), Comparative Analysis, Databases, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baranowski, George V. – Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 1980
Results of this study comparing coverage and features of Psychological Abstracts and National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) online databases demonstrate a 49 percent citation overlap between the files. A complementary, not competitive, relationship is indicated by comparing citation overlap, journal coverage, descriptive indexing, treatment of…
Descriptors: Citations (References), Comparative Analysis, Databases, Indexing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tenopir, Carol – Online Review, 1982
Describes experiment which compared two techniques used for evaluating and comparing database coverage of a subject area, e.g., "bibliography" and "subject profile." Differences in time, cost, and results achieved are compared by applying techniques to field of volcanology using two databases, Geological Reference File and GeoArchive. Twenty…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Citations (References), Comparative Analysis, Costs
Piotrowski, Chris; Perdue, Bob – 1988
The efficacy of using the BIOSIS Previews database as an online information retrieval tool in clinical psychology was investigated in a study conducted at the University of West Florida. Recognizing the importance of multi-database searching strategies when seeking comprehensive results, this study compared the citation output of this…
Descriptors: Behavioral Sciences, Citations (References), Clinical Psychology, Comparative Analysis
Sweetland, James H. – Database, 1983
Description of America: History and Life (AHL)--database including references from over 2,000 periodicals in literature, philosophy, religion, art, sociology, other disciplines of historical value--highlights structure; document treatment; access points; comparison of dissertation coverage between AHL and Comprehensive Dissertation Abstracts;…
Descriptors: Book Reviews, Citations (References), Comparative Analysis, Databases
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2