Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Randomized Controlled Trials | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Research Problems | 2 |
| Risk | 2 |
| Access to Information | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Attrition (Research Studies) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chang Xu | 1 |
| Clayton, Gemma L. | 1 |
| Higgins, Julian PT | 1 |
| Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn | 1 |
| Joey S. W. Kwong | 1 |
| Jones, Hayley E. | 1 |
| Lifeng Lin | 1 |
| Luis Furuya-Kanamori | 1 |
| Moustgaard, Helene | 1 |
| Savovic, Jelena | 1 |
| Sterne, Jonathan AC | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYuan Tian; Xi Yang; Suhail A. Doi; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Lifeng Lin; Joey S. W. Kwong; Chang Xu – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
RobotReviewer is a tool for automatically assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, but there is limited evidence of its reliability. We evaluated the agreement between RobotReviewer and humans regarding the risk of bias assessment based on 1955 randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias in these trials was assessed via two…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Classification, Robotics
Moustgaard, Helene; Jones, Hayley E.; Savovic, Jelena; Clayton, Gemma L.; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Higgins, Julian PT; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Randomized clinical trials underpin evidence-based clinical practice, but flaws in their conduct may lead to biased estimates of intervention effects and hence invalid treatment recommendations. The main approach to the empirical study of bias is to collate a number of meta-analyses and, within each, compare the results of trials with and without…
Descriptors: Epidemiology, Evidence, Medical Research, Intervention
Download full textWhat Works Clearinghouse, 2011
With its critical assessments of scientific evidence on the effectiveness of education programs, policies, and practices (referred to as "interventions"), and a range of products summarizing this evidence, the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an important part of the Institute of Education Sciences' strategy to use rigorous and relevant…
Descriptors: Standards, Access to Information, Information Management, Guides
