Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Redundancy | 2 |
| Cluster Grouping | 1 |
| Educational Indicators | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Indexing | 1 |
| Information Utilization | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Online Catalogs | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkSoh, Kay Cheng – Higher Education Review, 2012
Three university ranking systems in vogue have been shown in the previous issue of "Higher Education Review" to be capable of modifications to make them more parsimonious by using only about half of the number of predictors currently in use. This makes some of the predictors "redundant" as they contributed little to the overall ranking. It is…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Predictor Variables, Profiles, Test Items
Peer reviewedXu, Hong; Lancaster, F. W. – Library Resources & Technical Services, 1998
An analysis of 205 records in the OCLC Online Union Catalog (OLUC) found considerable duplication among subject access points provided by title, subject heading, and classification number fields. On average, only 4.12 unique access points were found per record. The results suggest that online catalogs might outperform card catalogs more in…
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Indexing, Online Catalogs
