Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Ability | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Test Length | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Calculators | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
| Cultural Differences | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| OECD Publishing (NJ1) | 1 |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Asia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
| Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkWu, Margaret – OECD Publishing (NJ1), 2010
This paper makes an in-depth comparison of the PISA (OECD) and TIMSS (IEA) mathematics assessments conducted in 2003. First, a comparison of survey methodologies is presented, followed by an examination of the mathematics frameworks in the two studies. The methodologies and the frameworks in the two studies form the basis for providing…
Descriptors: Mathematics Achievement, Foreign Countries, Gender Differences, Comparative Analysis
Download full textGialluca, Kathleen A.; And Others – 1984
In this study, simulated and actual Air Force test data were used to compare the different procedures for equating mental tests: conventional (equipercentile and linear), Item Response Theory (IRT), and strong true-score theory (STST); data collection designs used were single-group, equivalent-groups, and anchor test. Equating transformations were…
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis
