NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simper, Natalie; Frank, Brian; Kaupp, Jake; Mulligan, Nerissa; Scott, Jill – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Critical thinking, problem solving and communication are fundamental elements of undergraduate education, but methods for assessing these skills across an institution are susceptible to logistical, motivational and financial issues. Queen's University conducted two research studies investigating the use of standardised tests to assess cognitive…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bailey, Heather – Learning and Individual Differences, 2012
Working memory span tasks are popular measures, in part, because performance on these tasks predicts performance on other measures of cognitive ability. The traditional method of span-task administration is the experimenter-paced version, whose reliability and validity have been repeatedly demonstrated. However, computer-paced span tasks are…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Pacing, Cognitive Tests, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Ping; Xin, Tao; Wang, Chun; Chang, Hua-Hua – Psychometrika, 2012
Item replenishing is essential for item bank maintenance in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT). In regular CAT, online calibration is commonly used to calibrate the new items continuously. However, until now no reference has publicly become available about online calibration for CD-CAT. Thus, this study investigates the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Chun; Chang, Hua-Hua; Huebner, Alan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2011
This paper proposes two new item selection methods for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing: the restrictive progressive method and the restrictive threshold method. They are built upon the posterior weighted Kullback-Leibler (KL) information index but include additional stochastic components either in the item selection index or in…
Descriptors: Test Items, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Makransky, Guido; Glas, Cees A. W. – International Journal of Testing, 2013
Cognitive ability tests are widely used in organizations around the world because they have high predictive validity in selection contexts. Although these tests typically measure several subdomains, testing is usually carried out for a single subdomain at a time. This can be ineffective when the subdomains assessed are highly correlated. This…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cognitive Ability, Adaptive Testing, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guo, Jing; Tay, Louis; Drasgow, Fritz – International Journal of Testing, 2009
Test compromise is a concern in cognitive ability testing because such tests are widely used in employee selection and administered on a continuous basis. In this study, the resistance of cognitive tests, deployed in different test systems, to small-scale cheating conspiracies, was evaluated regarding the accuracy of ability estimation.…
Descriptors: Cheating, Cognitive Tests, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arendasy, Martin E.; Sommer, Markus; Gittler, Georg – Intelligence, 2010
Marked gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation have been broadly reported in the literature in the last few decades. Various theoretical models and accounts were used to explain the observed differences. Within the framework of linking item design features of mental rotation tasks to cognitive component processes associated with…
Descriptors: Cues, Females, Models, Protocol Analysis
Sorensen, H. Barbara – AEDS Monitor, 1985
This study validated computerized versions of selected tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests of 1976, compared performance of higher education students on computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the tests, and explored whether gender, academic status, or age interacted with the tests. (MBR)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis