Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Algorithms | 8 |
Comparative Analysis | 8 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 8 |
Adaptive Testing | 4 |
Estimation (Mathematics) | 3 |
Simulation | 3 |
Test Construction | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Calculus | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Item Banks | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bergstrom, Betty A. | 1 |
Chang, Shun-Wen | 1 |
Clauser, Brian E. | 1 |
Clyman, Stephen G. | 1 |
Gershon, Richard | 1 |
Ha Le | 1 |
Jeff Ford | 1 |
Jillian Downey | 1 |
Kaylee Vick | 1 |
Margolis, Melissa J. | 1 |
Meisner, Richard | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jeff Ford; Rachel Erickson; Ha Le; Kaylee Vick; Jillian Downey – PRIMUS, 2024
In this study, we analyzed student participation and success in a college-level Calculus I course that utilized standards-based grading. By measuring the level to which students participate in this class structure, we were able to use a clustering algorithm that revealed multiple groupings of students that were distinct based on activity…
Descriptors: Calculus, Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Achievement, Grades (Scholastic)
Zhongzhou Chen; Tom Zhang; Michelle Taub – Journal of Learning Analytics, 2024
The current study measures the extent to which students' self-regulated learning tactics and learning outcomes change as the result of a deliberate, data-driven improvement in the learning design of mastery-based online learning modules. In the original design, students were required to attempt the assessment once before being allowed to access…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Algorithms, Instructional Materials, Course Content
Chang, Shun-Wen; Twu, Bor-Yaun – 1998
This study investigated and compared the properties of five methods of item exposure control within the purview of estimating examinees' abilities in a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) context. Each of the exposure control algorithms was incorporated into the item selection procedure and the adaptive testing progressed based on the CAT design…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
The Comparability of the Statistical Characteristics of Test Items Generated by Computer Algorithms.
Meisner, Richard; And Others – 1993
This paper presents a study on the generation of mathematics test items using algorithmic methods. The history of this approach is briefly reviewed and is followed by a survey of the research to date on the statistical parallelism of algorithmically generated mathematics items. Results are presented for 8 parallel test forms generated using 16…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks

Clauser, Brian E.; Margolis, Melissa J.; Clyman, Stephen G.; Ross, Linette P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
Research on automated scoring is extended by comparing alternative automated systems for scoring a computer simulation of physicians' patient management skills. A regression-based system is more highly correlated with experts' evaluations than a system that uses complex rules to map performances into score levels, but both approaches are feasible.…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Automation, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Schnipke, Deborah L.; Reese, Lynda M. – 1997
Two-stage and multistage test designs provide a way of roughly adapting item difficulty to test-taker ability. All test takers take a parallel stage-one test, and, based on their scores, they are routed to tests of different difficulty levels in subsequent stages. These designs provide some of the benefits of standard computerized adaptive testing…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Comparative Analysis
Bergstrom, Betty A.; Gershon, Richard – 1992
The most useful method of item selection for making pass-fail decisions with a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) was studied. Medical technology students (n=86) took a computer adaptive test in which items were targeted to the ability of the examinee. The adaptive algorithm that selected items and estimated person measures used the Rasch model and…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Shermis, Mark D.; And Others – 1992
The reliability of four branching algorithms commonly used in computer adaptive testing (CAT) was examined. These algorithms were: (1) maximum likelihood (MLE); (2) Bayesian; (3) modal Bayesian; and (4) crossover. Sixty-eight undergraduate college students were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions using the HyperCard-based CAT program,…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis