NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martois, John S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Copies of this program may be obtained from the author at the University of Southern California, School of Pharmacy, University Park, Los Angeles 90007. (CB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Input Output, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morris, John D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Three algorithms for selecting a subset of originally available items, to maximize coefficient alpha, were compared on the size of the resulting alpha and computation time required with nine sets of data. The characteristics of a computer program to perform these item analyses are described. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques
Ree, Malcolm James – 1976
A method for developing statistically parallel tests based on the analysis of unique item variance was developed. A test population of 907 basic airmen trainees were required to estimate the angle at which an object in a photograph was viewed, selecting from eight possibilities. A FORTRAN program known as VARSEL was used to rank all the test items…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Enlisted Personnel, Item Analysis
Benson, Jeri – 1979
Two methods of item selection were used to select sets of 40 items from a 50-item verbal analogies test, and the resulting item sets were compared for relative efficiency. The BICAL program was used to select the 40 items having the best mean square fit to the one parameter logistic (Rasch) model. The LOGIST program was used to select the 40 items…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Costs, Efficiency
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huck, Schuyler W.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Believing that examinee-by-item interaction should be conceptualized as true score variability rather than as a result of errors of measurement, Lu proposed a modification of Hoyt's analysis of variance reliability procedure. Via a computer simulation study, it is shown that Lu's approach does not separate interaction from error. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Difficulty Level
Larkin, Kevin C.; Weiss, David J. – 1975
A 15-stage pyramidal test and a 40-item two-stage test were constructed and administered by computer to 111 college undergraduates. The two-stage test was found to utilize a smaller proportion of its potential score range than the pyramidal test. Score distributions for both tests were positively skewed but not significantly different from the…
Descriptors: Ability, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs
Hansen, Duncan N.; And Others – 1977
A computerized adaptive testing model was assessed in a technical training system. The model, a modification of Lord's flexilevel paradigm, consisted of: the sequencing of test items in a difficulty hierarchy, adaptive entry of students into the test at a difficulty level appropriate to their predicted score, and systematic movement of students…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Branching, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs