Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Constructed Response | 2 |
| Objective Tests | 2 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Course Evaluation | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| College Teaching | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCirn, John T. – College Teaching, 1986
A comparison of the actual final grade distribution with what the grade distributions would have been had only the true/false components or the short-answer components been used is presented. The responses to a course evaluation survey that asked students to compare the two types of questions are summarized. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Constructed Response, Course Evaluation
Download full textPoggio, John P.; Glasnapp, Douglas R. – 1994
This paper reports on a newly designed judgmental method for setting test performance standard that: (1) overcome many of the practical and psychometric problems associated with the Angoff and Ebel methods; (2) can be used to set multiple cut points on a score scale; (3) may be readily and efficiently implemented with assessments that use…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Constructed Response, Cutting Scores, Decision Making
