Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Educational Testing | 3 |
| Intelligence Tests | 3 |
| Test Results | 2 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| College Outcomes Assessment | 1 |
| College Programs | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Cultural Differences | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Grubb, Richard D. | 1 |
| Kugelmass, Heather | 1 |
| Mishra, Shitala P. | 1 |
| Nemeth, Alex | 1 |
| Piotrowski, Richard J. | 1 |
| Steedle, Jeffrey | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
| Collegiate Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkSteedle, Jeffrey; Kugelmass, Heather; Nemeth, Alex – Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2010
Many postsecondary institutions currently administer standardized tests of general college outcomes; more than a quarter of Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) member institutions do so. Using standardized tests for accountability purposes has been contentious mainly because these tests do not measure every important…
Descriptors: Test Results, Standardized Tests, Test Validity, Educational Testing
Peer reviewedMishra, Shitala P. – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Investigated the effect of examiners' ethnicity on the intelligence test performance of Anglo and Mexican-American subjects. On the WISC Vocabulary, Mexican-American subjects scored significantly higher when the test was administered by Mexican-American examiners. (Author)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Cultural Differences, Educational Testing
Peer reviewedPiotrowski, Richard J.; Grubb, Richard D. – Journal of School Psychology, 1976
Psychologists must often make decisions about the significance of scaled score differences between subtests on the WISC-R. Differences which are statistically significant at the .05 and .01 level are presented. Cautions concerning the interpretation of statistically significant differences are discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Educational Diagnosis, Educational Testing
