Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Electronic Publishing | 3 |
Readability | 3 |
Readability Formulas | 3 |
Reading Comprehension | 2 |
Reading Instruction | 2 |
Reading Materials | 2 |
Reading Processes | 2 |
Reading Tests | 2 |
Attention Deficit Disorders | 1 |
Autism | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Indonesia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Fry Readability Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hendratno; Nurul Istiq’faroh; Fajar Nur Yasin; Amiruddin Hadi Wibowo; Abd. Ghofur – International Journal of Language Education, 2025
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Fry readability-based digital storybooks on reading comprehension skills among elementary school students. The method used in this study was an experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group design to measure students' reading comprehension skills. The sample of this study was…
Descriptors: Electronic Publishing, Story Reading, Reading Comprehension, Benchmarking
Singer Trakhman, Lauren M.; Alexander, Patricia A.; Berkowitz, Lisa E. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2019
This study explored the effects of processing texts in print or digitally on readers' comprehension, processing time, and calibration. Eighty-six undergraduates read print and digital versions of book excerpts about childhood ailments presented in counterbalanced order. Comprehension was tested at three levels (i.e., main idea, key points, and…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reading Comprehension, Undergraduate Students, Comparative Analysis
Gallagher, Tiffany; Fazio, Xavier; Ciampa, Katia – Canadian Journal of Education, 2017
Science curriculum standards were mapped onto various texts (literacy readers, trade books, online articles). Statistical analyses highlighted the inconsistencies among readability formulae for Grades 2-6 levels of the standards. There was a lack of correlation among the readability measures, and also when comparing different text sources. Online…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Readability, Textbooks, Science Education