Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Beginning Reading | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Ideography | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Initial Teaching Alphabet | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Linguistics | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHamada, Megumi; Koda, Keiko – Applied Linguistics, 2010
Two hypotheses were tested: Similarity between first language (L1) and second language (L2) orthographic processing facilitates L2-decoding efficiency; and L2-decoding efficiency contributes to word-meaning inference to different degrees among L2 learners with diverse L1 orthographic backgrounds. The participants were college-level English as a…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Inferences, Decoding (Reading), Language Acquisition
MAZURKIEWICZ, ALBERT J. – 1965
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO METHODS OF FIRST-GRADE BEGINNING READING INSTRUCTION WERE INVESTIGATED. APPROXIMATELY 920 FIRST-GRADE CHILDREN WERE DIVIDED INTO 2 GROUPS WHICH RECEIVED 1 OF THE 2 METHODS. TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF CERTAIN VARIABLES ON READING ACHIEVEMENT, THE CHILDREN WERE MATCHED IN PAIRS. THE RESULTS WERE GATHERED FROM ONE GROUP…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Grade 1
