Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 9 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 35 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 45 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 76 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 122 |
Evaluation Methods | 122 |
Decision Making | 117 |
Foreign Countries | 29 |
Models | 28 |
Student Evaluation | 16 |
Task Analysis | 15 |
Teaching Methods | 14 |
Evaluation Criteria | 13 |
Scores | 13 |
Computer Software | 11 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Australia | 4 |
United Kingdom (England) | 4 |
United States | 4 |
China | 3 |
Colorado | 3 |
Germany | 3 |
United Kingdom | 3 |
Estonia | 2 |
Netherlands | 2 |
Ohio | 2 |
Pennsylvania | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
Self Directed Search | 1 |
Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ian Greener – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2024
This paper argues for three aspects of tolerance with respect to QCA research: tolerance with respect to different approaches to QCA; producing QCA research with tolerance (work that is resistant to criticism); and for QCA researchers to be clear about the tolerance of the solutions they present -- especially in terms of calibration and truth…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Research Methodology, Comparative Analysis, Research Design
Baumgartner, Michael; Ambühl, Mathias – Sociological Methods & Research, 2023
Consistency and coverage are two core parameters of model fit used by configurational comparative methods (CCMs) of causal inference. Among causal models that perform equally well in other respects (e.g., robustness or compliance with background theories), those with higher consistency and coverage are typically considered preferable. Finding the…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Evaluation Methods, Goodness of Fit, Scores
Shunji Wang; Katerina M. Marcoulides; Jiashan Tang; Ke-Hai Yuan – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A necessary step in applying bi-factor models is to evaluate the need for domain factors with a general factor in place. The conventional null hypothesis testing (NHT) was commonly used for such a purpose. However, the conventional NHT meets challenges when the domain loadings are weak or the sample size is insufficient. This article proposes…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Error of Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods
Dizon, Arnie G. – History of Education, 2023
CIPP, which stands for Context, Input, Process and Product, an evaluation model, is one of the most widely applied curriculum evaluation models in education. This document-based study sought to determine the historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model. Here, the reasons why the CIPP evaluation model was conceptualised are…
Descriptors: Educational History, Curriculum Evaluation, Models, Curriculum Development
Markus T. Jansen; Ralf Schulze – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Thurstonian forced-choice modeling is considered to be a powerful new tool to estimate item and person parameters while simultaneously testing the model fit. This assessment approach is associated with the aim of reducing faking and other response tendencies that plague traditional self-report trait assessments. As a result of major recent…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Item Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Hyemin Yoon; HyunJin Kim; Sangjin Kim – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2024
We have maintained the customer grade system that is being implemented to customers with excellent performance through customer segmentation for years. Currently, financial institutions that operate the customer grade system provide similar services based on the score calculation criteria, but the score calculation criteria vary from the financial…
Descriptors: Classification, Artificial Intelligence, Prediction, Decision Making
Karel Kok; Sophia Chroszczinsky; Burkhard Priemer – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2024
Data comparison problems are used in teaching and science education research that focuses on students' ability to compare datasets and their conceptual understanding of measurement uncertainties. However, the evaluation of students' decisions in these problems can pose a problem: e.g., students making a correct decision for the wrong reasons.…
Descriptors: Secondary School Students, Undergraduate Students, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Seda Abacioglu; Büsra Ayan; Dragan Pamucar – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
This study investigates the evolving landscape of green universities by analyzing and comparing rankings from 2018 to 2022. It expands beyond the single score offered by the UI GreenMetric, employing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques to evaluate universities from diverse perspectives. Focusing on the top 50 universities from 2022,…
Descriptors: Universities, Comparative Education, Comparative Analysis, Reputation
Rebecca Sickinger; Tineke Brunfaut; John Pill – Language Testing, 2025
Comparative Judgement (CJ) is an evaluation method, typically conducted online, whereby a rank order is constructed, and scores calculated, from judges' pairwise comparisons of performances. CJ has been researched in various educational contexts, though only rarely in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing settings, and is generally agreed to…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Williamson, Joanna – Research Matters, 2022
Providing evidence that can inform awarding is an important application of Comparative Judgement (CJ) methods in high-stakes qualifications. The process of marking scripts is not changed, but CJ methods can assist in the maintenance of standards from one series to another by informing decisions about where to place grade boundaries or cut scores.…
Descriptors: Standards, Grading, Decision Making, Comparative Analysis
Gill, Tim – Research Matters, 2022
In Comparative Judgement (CJ) exercises, examiners are asked to look at a selection of candidate scripts (with marks removed) and order them in terms of which they believe display the best quality. By including scripts from different examination sessions, the results of these exercises can be used to help with maintaining standards. Results from…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Scripts, Standards
Katrina Fulcher-Rood; Anny Castilla-Earls – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2023
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare child language assessment practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working in school and non-school settings to determine if their place of employment impacts the diagnostic decision-making process. Method: School-based SLPs (e.g., direct service providers employed in preschool and/or K-12…
Descriptors: Child Language, Speech Language Pathology, Language Tests, Allied Health Personnel
Guler, Gul; Cikrikci, Rahime Nukhet – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2022
The purpose of this study was to investigate the Type I Error findings and power rates of the methods used to determine dimensionality in unidimensional and bidimensional psychological constructs for various conditions (characteristic of the distribution, sample size, length of the test, and interdimensional correlation) and to examine the joint…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Decision Making, Factor Analysis
Davis, Kirsten A.; Jesiek, Brent K.; Knight, David B. – Journal of Engineering Education, 2023
Background: Engineers operate in an increasingly global environment, making it important that engineering students develop global engineering competency to prepare them for success in the workplace. To understand this learning, we need assessment approaches that go beyond traditional self-report surveys. A previous study (Jesiek et al.,…
Descriptors: Vignettes, Engineering Education, Study Abroad, Foreign Countries
Leech, Tony; Chambers, Lucy – Research Matters, 2022
Two of the central issues in comparative judgement (CJ), which are perhaps underexplored compared to questions of the method's reliability and technical quality, are "what processes do judges use to make their decisions" and "what features do they focus on when making their decisions?" This article discusses both, in the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Evaluators, Reliability