NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seda Abacioglu; Büsra Ayan; Dragan Pamucar – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
This study investigates the evolving landscape of green universities by analyzing and comparing rankings from 2018 to 2022. It expands beyond the single score offered by the UI GreenMetric, employing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques to evaluate universities from diverse perspectives. Focusing on the top 50 universities from 2022,…
Descriptors: Universities, Comparative Education, Comparative Analysis, Reputation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Calderon, Angel – Journal of Studies in International Education, 2023
Higher education institutions (HEIs) have long embraced a path towards sustainability and engaged in supporting sustainable development. The adoption of the sustainability development goals has forced HEIs to assess how they engage with these goals and how they address societal challenges head on. However, the emergence of sustainability rankings…
Descriptors: Sustainability, Institutional Evaluation, Sustainable Development, Objectives
Kayyali, Mustafa – Online Submission, 2023
University rankings have a growing impact on how people view the academic excellence of higher education. The complicated relationship between rankings and academic excellence is explored in this essay along with how it may affect higher education policy and practice. The importance of rankings and their influence on institutional decision-making…
Descriptors: Correlation, Reputation, Educational Quality, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Decuypere, Mathias; Landri, Paolo – Critical Studies in Education, 2021
University rankings have become commonplace in higher education. Traditional quantified rankings do not merely measure educational performance: they equally grant status, enforce competition between institutions, and are emblematic for the ongoing capitalization of higher education. Drawing on the field of Science and Technology Studies, this…
Descriptors: Universities, Institutional Evaluation, Educational Quality, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf; Tan, Christine Nya-Ling; Daud, Mahyuddin; Awalludin, Muhammad Mukhtar Noor – Issues in Educational Research, 2020
University rankings have gradually become an issue for concern in the academic community worldwide. Several mechanisms with different methodologies have been developed to rank the universities appropriately. However, some ranking tools have notable issues, especially with the indicators adopted. Some are based merely on research performance,…
Descriptors: Universities, Institutional Evaluation, Reputation, Comparative Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Jenny J.; Vance, Hillary; Stensaker, Bjørn; Ghosh, Sowmya – Comparative Education, 2020
This study examined how hierarchical positions within the global field of higher education influence the selection of strategic priorities by universities in different parts of the world. The study particularly focused on universities' commitment to third missions as reflected in their strategic plans and compared to their global rankings. The…
Descriptors: Reputation, Institutional Evaluation, Universities, Strategic Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chinta, Ravi; Kebritchi, Mansureh; Ellias, Janelle – International Journal of Educational Management, 2016
Purpose: Performance evaluation is a topic that has been researched and practiced extensively in business organizations but has received scant attention in higher education institutions. A review of literature revealed that context, input, process, product (CIPP) model is an appropriate performance evaluation model for higher education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Institutional Evaluation, Models, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de la Torre, Eva M.; Gómez-Sancho, José-María; Perez-Esparrells, Carmen – Tertiary Education and Management, 2017
New public management and increasing levels of competition driven by global rankings are bringing the managerial practices of public and private higher education institutions closer together. However, these two types of institutions still maintain different objectives and traditions and enjoy different degrees of autonomy that are reflected in…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Institutional Evaluation, State Universities, Competition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chorna, Olga – Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 2015
The article reveals specific features of functioning systems of higher education quality monitoring at the present stage, taking into account national traditions, historical experience and mentality of the population. The article introduces a comparative analysis of monitoring actors at national, regional and local levels in two countries. The…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Reputation, Comparative Analysis, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kopatz, Susanne; Pilz, Matthias – International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2015
This paper analyses the returns to education of specific occupations in Canada. The purpose is to scrutinize whether and in how far academic and vocational education do differ in monetary benefits regarding individual returns. Therefore, two different methodologies of calculation are used to compute the concrete returns to education. As a result…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Outcomes of Education, Comparative Analysis, College Graduates
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2013
Discrepancies between the nominal and attained indicator weights misinform rank consumers as to the relative importance of the indicators. This may lead to unwarranted institutional judgements and misdirected actions, causing resources being wasted unnecessarily. As a follow-up to two earlier studies, data from the Academic Ranking of World…
Descriptors: Reputation, Universities, Scores, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Borhan, Maslan; Jemain, Abdul Aziz – Social Indicators Research, 2012
A lot of attention has been given to education as it is the most practical way of improving social mobility. In order to be progressive and resilient, there has to be an overall transformation of society as evidenced in the annual budget allocations which has educational implications to it. Therefore, schools will come to term that they are under…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Decision Making, Social Mobility, Beliefs
Lin, Zeng, Gao, Yan-he – Online Submission, 2010
One of the key features of American hegemonic power is the ability to attract talents from all over the world, especially in those shortage areas of science and technology. To explore what is behind the advanced American higher education system, this research compares native and foreign born faculty using four dimensions: demographics, field of…
Descriptors: Productivity, Higher Education, Universities, Journal Articles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Obasi, Isaac N. – Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2008
The ranking of universities today is traceable to the pioneer efforts of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education in 1970 when it started the classification of US Colleges and Universities. But the present-day ranking of universities in a form of league table at national levels was started in 1983 by the US News and World Report, and was later…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Reputation, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Urbancic, Frank R. – Journal of Education for Business, 2008
In its plan to combat the PhD shortage crisis, the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International (AACSB; 2003) has called for the development of PhD program rankings to serve as incentives for academic institutions to invest more in PhD programs, thereby counterbalancing the disproportionate influence of master of business…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Business Administration Education, Doctoral Programs, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2