Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Africa Education Review | 1 |
Education Economics | 1 |
Journal of Vocational Behavior | 1 |
Reading Improvement | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
South Africa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Okeke-Uzodike, O. E.; Chitakunye, Pepukayi – Africa Education Review, 2016
This study contributes to the on-going discourse on calibration among University students. The study examines the understanding of student self-reflectivity in relation to class written tests and assignments, and of the fact that students' expected results rarely match the actual results. A quantitative research approach was adopted to collect…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Business Administration Education, Assignments, Undergraduate Students
Jerrim, John – Education Economics, 2015
Several studies have considered whether American college students' hold "realistic" wage expectations. The consensus is that they do not--overestimation of future earnings is in the region of 40-50%. But is it just college students who overestimate the success they will have in the labor market, or is this something common to all…
Descriptors: College Students, Young Adults, Prediction, Predictive Validity

Ivancevich, John M. – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1976
A behaviorally specific motivational effort rating scale was developed and tested. The organizational specific scale results were examined and compared to those generated from the Landy and Guion scale. It was found that the organizationally specific and engineer relevant scale is a better predictor of two types of expectancies. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Analysis, Engineers, Expectation

Bradley, Karla R.; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1978
Compares the Bond and Tinker, and the Harris reading expectancy formulas, using 113 fourth, fifth, and sixth graders. Finds that the use of both formulas is desirable in clinical situations, but that the Harris formula is preferable if gains on standardized tests are the only criteria of success. (RL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Expectation, Intermediate Grades, Measurement Techniques