NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Filippello, Pina; Buzzai, Caterina; Sorrenti, Luana; Costa, Sebastiano; Abramo, Annarita; Wang, Kennet T. – Applied Developmental Science, 2021
The aim of this manuscript is to examine the perceived parental perfectionism in undergraduate Italian students. Study 1 aimed at exploring the factorial structure, reliability, and construct validity of the Italian version of the Family Almost Perfect Scale (FAPS). The aim of Study 2 was to cross-validate the FAPS structure with a different…
Descriptors: Italian, Personality Measures, Undergraduate Students, Parent Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hesselmark, Eva; Eriksson, Jonna M.; Westerlund, Joakim; Bejerot, Susanne – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2015
Although self-reported measures are frequently used to assess adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), the validity of self-reports is under-researched in ASD. The core symptoms of ASD may negatively affect the psychometric properties of self-reported measures. The aim of the present study was to test the validity and reliability of…
Descriptors: Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Adults, Measurement Techniques, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Svartdal, Frode – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2017
Procrastination has been defined in different ways. Two instruments--the Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS) and the Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS)--focus on a core problem in procrastination--the irrational delay of intended behavior. The present paper examined the psychometric properties of the Norwegian translations of these scales. In…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Correlation, Factor Structure, Translation
Akram, Hadeel Abdulah – ProQuest LLC, 2017
The factor structure of Holland's hexagonal model as shown in the Self-Directed Search (SDS) has received extensive attention across the world. The goal in creating the SDS was to equip guidance counselors and services with information about adults' personality types, interests, preferences, and career options. More precisely, the SDS items assess…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Translation, Semitic Languages, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leyfer, Ovsanna; John, Angela E.; Woodruff-Borden, Janet; Mervis, Carolyn B. – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012
To examine the factor structure of temperament in 5-10-year-olds with Williams syndrome, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the responses of parents of 192 children on the children's behavior questionnaire. Four factors were identified. Two corresponded to factors reported for typically developing children: effortful control and…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Measures (Individuals), Anxiety Disorders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
De Fruyt, Filip; De Bolle, Marleen; McCrae, Robert R.; Terracciano, Antonio; Costa, Paul T., Jr. – Assessment, 2009
The structure and psychometric characteristics of the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), a more readable version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), are examined and compared with NEO-PI-R characteristics using data from college student observer ratings of 5,109 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years from 24 cultures. Replacement…
Descriptors: Early Adolescents, Factor Structure, Personality, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thalmayer, Amber Gayle; Saucier, Gerard; Eigenhuis, Annemarie – Psychological Assessment, 2011
A general consensus on the Big Five model of personality attributes has been highly generative for the field of personality psychology. Many important psychological and life outcome correlates with Big Five trait dimensions have been established. But researchers must choose between multiple Big Five inventories when conducting a study and are…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Personality Measures, Test Length, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Prince-Embury, Sandra; Courville, Troy – Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2008
This article examines the scale structure of the Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA). Confirmatory factor analysis reveals that a three-factor model is a better fit than one- or two-factor models for the normative sample. These findings lend support to the construct validity of the RSCA. The three-factor model is discussed as a…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Children, Factor Structure, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Kenneth T.; Yuen, Mantak; Slaney, Robert B. – Counseling Psychologist, 2009
This study investigates the cross-cultural construct validity of perfectionism using the Chinese translation of the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R; Slaney, Mobley, Trippi, Ashby, & Johnson, 1996) with 509 Chinese high school students from Hong Kong. The factor structure of the Chinese APS-R and correlations between the APS-R subscales and…
Descriptors: Life Satisfaction, Construct Validity, Factor Structure, Emotional Adjustment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowe, David C.; Plomin, Robert – Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977
The structure of temperament proposed by the New York Longitudinal Study (NYLS) was compared to Buss and Plomin's EASI temperament theory. A similar sociability factor emerged from both systems, but other temperaments were unique. The two systems were merged to form the Colorado Childhood Temperament Inventory. (Author/MV)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Analysis, Early Childhood Education, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marshall, Margarita B.; De Fruyt, Filip; Rolland, Jean-Pierre; Bagby, R. Michael – Psychological Assessment, 2005
The goal of the present investigation is to compare the factor structure of the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) in samples of respondents differentially motivated to respond in a socially desirable manner. In the French sample, the authors compared the NEO PI-R structure of job applicants…
Descriptors: Job Applicants, Factor Structure, Career Counseling, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Frazier, Thomas W.; Naugle, Richard I.; Haggerty, Kathryn A. – Psychological Assessment, 2006
The 160-item short form of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) was developed for situations in which respondents complete only the 1st half of the test. The present study evaluates the adequacy and comparability of the full and short forms of the PAI in terms of a wide range of psychometric characteristics. In all, 421 participants…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Personality Assessment, Reliability, Evaluation Methods
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
MacPhee, David – 1980
The reliability and validity of three measures of infant temperament were compared in this study. The measures included the revised Carey (1978) Infant Temperament Questionnaire, a version of the Bayley (1969) Infant Behavior Record revised for completion by the parent, and a modified version of Buss and Plomin's (1975) EASI, an acronym standing…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Comparative Analysis, Factor Structure, Individual Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Overall, John E.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Structure, Oblique Rotation, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edwards, Allen L.; Abbott, Robert D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Study was undertaken to determine the degree to which the EPPS, CPI, and 16 PF scales are correlated with the EPI scales and to determine the degree to which the scales in all four inventories are measuring the same common traits. (Authors)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Structure, Measurement Instruments, Personality Assessment
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2