NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schulz, Renate A. – Foreign Language Annals, 1996
Reports on an exploratory study that examined and compared foreign-language student and teacher beliefs regarding the benefit of a focus on form in language learning. Results showed that students are relatively favorable toward a focus on form; however, surprising discrepancies surfaced in teacher beliefs and in a comparison of student and teacher…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error Correction, Feedback, Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Skinner, Christopher H.; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1992
Compared effects of peer-delivered (PDF) and self-delivered (SDF) immediate corrective feedback intervention on multiplication performance of six second grade students. SDF resulted in greater multiplication performance for four of six students, suggesting that SDF interventions may be more efficient and less obtrusive than PDF interventions and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error Correction, Evaluation, Feedback
Terrell, Dudley J. – Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1990
Describes study of Army aviation students who were enrolled in training program that was designed to compare the effects of two strategies of error remediation during computer-based instruction (CBI). Treatments for the two experimental groups and a control group that had no CBI are described, and results of pretests and posttests are discussed.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Error Correction, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yang, Jie Chi; Akahori, Kanji – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1999
Compares two Web-based systems. The Japanese writing computer-assisted language-learning system, the T system, enables learners to key-in sentences freely, detects learners' errors and displays appropriate feedback messages to guide learners to correct errors themselves. The M system enables learners to input their answer from a multiple selection…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Error Correction, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Narciss, Susanne; Huth, Katja – Learning and Instruction, 2006
Most studies on feedback compare elaborated feedback types presenting knowledge on the correct response (KCR) immediately together with further information to simple feedback types providing knowledge of result (KR) or KCR. This study uses bug-related tutoring feedback (BRT-feedback) offering strategic information for error correction, but no…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Feedback, Programmed Tutoring, Grade 4
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lin, Yue-Hong; Hedgcock, John – Language Learning, 1996
Analyzes the incorporation patterns of well-educated, but low proficiency, Chinese immigrants (n=4) to Spain and of high-proficiency Chinese university students (n=4) with extensive formal training in Spanish. Findings reveal that whereas the university students showed awareness of error and successfully incorporated native speakers' corrections,…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Error Correction
Kubota, Mikio – Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin, 1994
This study investigated what forms of feedback, if any, helped students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learn grammar. Subjects, 100 Japanese college students of EFL, were given two types of tests on English dative ("to/for") alternation, then divided into five groups, according to the type of feedback they received: (1) group A was given…
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Classroom Research, Classroom Techniques, College Students
Ihde, Thomas W. – 1994
Most research in feedback has not found significant differences in error correcting approaches for L2 writing. This paper reviews research on error correction approaches used by second language instructors and reports on a survey of 50 French and American instructors of English as a Second Language (ESL). Although research over the last 35 years…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nagata, Noriko; Swisher, M. Virginia – Foreign Language Annals, 1995
Investigates the effectiveness of two types of computer feedback: one is traditional computer feedback that indicates only missing or unexpected words in the learner's response, and the other is intelligent computer feedback that provides further information about the nature of the errors in the form of metalinguistic rules. (17 references)…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Consciousness Raising
Song, Minjong – 1998
An experimental study compared the effects of controlled and free writing exercises and of evaluative vs. communicative feedback on the writing quality and apprehension of Korean college students of English as a foreign language (EFL). Students in two sections of a freshman reading course wrote dialogue journals as practice in free writing, and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classroom Techniques, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Huang, Su-Yueh – 2000
Some university English as a foreign language (EFL) composition teachers in Taiwan have experimented with audiotaping their commentary on students' writing to help students revise. However, there has been little research on how effective this is for Chinese students. Therefore, a study was designed to shed light on this issue by comparing…
Descriptors: Audiotape Recordings, Case Studies, Chinese, College Students