Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Braille | 1 |
| Conditioning | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Discovery Learning | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of the Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Brazil | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTomanari, Gerson Y.; Sidman, Murray; Rubio, Adriana R.; Dube, William V. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
Five adult humans were tested for emergent conditional discriminations under rapid-responding contingencies. During four-comparison matching-to-sample baseline training (AB and AC), limited-hold contingencies for responding to samples and comparisons were gradually restricted to the shortest duration consistent with at least 95% accuracy and no…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Staff Utilization, Undergraduate Students
Download full textNagengast, Daniel L.; And Others – 1990
The effects of rule knowledge were investigated using Braille inkprint pairs. Both recognition and recall were studied in three groups of subjects: rule knowledge, rule discovery, and no rule. Two hypotheses were tested: (1) that the group exposed to the rule would score better than would a discovery group and a control group; and (2) that all…
Descriptors: Braille, Comparative Analysis, Cues, Discovery Learning
