NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ring, Gail L.; Waugaman, Chelsea; Brackett, Bob – International Journal of ePortfolio, 2017
This research project investigated how the development of an ePortfolio, combined with ePortfolio pedagogies, impacted the interview performance of undergraduate students as they prepared to enter the job market. Participants were students in the Health Sciences and Biosystems Engineering programs at Clemson University, enrolled in…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Portfolios (Background Materials), Electronic Publishing, Career Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McDow, Lauren W.; Zabrucky, Karen M. – Journal of College Student Development, 2015
In the current economic landscape, most college students' primary goal for obtaining an undergraduate degree is an increase in job opportunities and salary potential. Additionally, the average combined result of graduates' job searches is one of the primary factors in rankings of higher education institutions. In this study we assessed the…
Descriptors: Career Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Resumes (Personal), Self Efficacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bonaccio, Silvia; Gauvin, Natalie; Reeve, Charlie L. – Journal of Career Development, 2014
The authors investigate the role of emotions in the job search and choice process of novice job seekers. Results of qualitative analyses of the first-person accounts of 41 job seekers indicate that participants whose recollections of their job search contained emotional language were more likely to display a haphazard job search strategy than…
Descriptors: Novices, Job Search Methods, Career Choice, Search Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Austin, Margaret Faughnan; Grant, Thomas N. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1981
Although all treatment groups performed significantly greater than the control group on interview performance, there was no significant difference between the five conditions. The use of additional equipment and experiential training did not show superiority over a purely didactic approach in training disadvantaged college students. (Author)
Descriptors: Assertiveness, Career Counseling, College Students, Comparative Analysis