NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lu Qin; Shishun Zhao; Wenlai Guo; Tiejun Tong; Ke Yang – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
The application of network meta-analysis is becoming increasingly widespread, and for a successful implementation, it requires that the direct comparison result and the indirect comparison result should be consistent. Because of this, a proper detection of inconsistency is often a key issue in network meta-analysis as whether the results can be…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Network Analysis, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siegel, Lianne; Chu, Haitao – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Reference intervals, or reference ranges, aid medical decision-making by containing a pre-specified proportion (e.g., 95%) of the measurements in a representative healthy population. We recently proposed three approaches for estimating a reference interval from a meta-analysis based on a random effects model: a frequentist approach, a Bayesian…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis, Intervals, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Efthimiou, Orestis; White, Ian R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Standard models for network meta-analysis simultaneously estimate multiple relative treatment effects. In practice, after estimation, these multiple estimates usually pass through a formal or informal selection procedure, eg, when researchers draw conclusions about the effects of the best performing treatment in the network. In this paper, we…
Descriptors: Models, Meta Analysis, Network Analysis, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Albert, Isabelle; Makowski, David – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
The mixed treatment comparison (MTC) method has been proposed to combine results across trials comparing several treatments. MTC allows coherent judgments on which of the treatments is the most effective. It produces estimates of the relative effects of each treatment compared with every other treatment by pooling direct and indirect evidence. In…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Agriculture, Agricultural Production, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Piepho, Hans-Peter; Madden, Laurence V. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Network meta-analysis is a popular method to synthesize the information obtained in a systematic review of studies (e.g., randomized clinical trials) involving subsets of multiple treatments of interest. The dominant method of analysis employs within-study information on treatment contrasts and integrates this over a network of studies. One…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Meta Analysis, Networks, Drug Therapy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Zundert, Camiel H. J.; Miocevic, Milica – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Synthesizing findings about the indirect (mediated) effect plays an important role in determining the mechanism through which variables affect one another. This simulation study compared six methods for synthesizing indirect effects: correlation-based MASEM, parameter-based MASEM, marginal likelihood synthesis, an adjustment to marginal likelihood…
Descriptors: Correlation, Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis, Bayesian Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Verhavert, San; Bouwer, Renske; Donche, Vincent; De Maeyer, Sven – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2019
Comparative Judgement (CJ) aims to improve the quality of performance-based assessments by letting multiple assessors judge pairs of performances. CJ is generally associated with high levels of reliability, but there is also a large variation in reliability between assessments. This study investigates which assessment characteristics influence the…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Reliability, Comparative Analysis, Value Judgment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Foster, Colin – International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2022
Confidence assessment (CA) involves students stating alongside each of their answers a confidence rating (e.g. 0 low to 10 high) to express how certain they are that their answer is correct. Each student's score is calculated as the sum of the confidence ratings on the items that they answered correctly, minus the sum of the confidence ratings on…
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Mathematics Education, Secondary School Students, Meta Analysis
Atmaca, Furkan; Baloglu, Mustafa – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2022
We compared the Wechsler scores of individuals with twice-exceptionality (2e) and giftedness using a three-level Bayesian meta-analysis. Ninety-five effect sizes were calculated from 15 studies (n = 2,106). Results show that individuals with 2e who have learning disabilities perform lower than individuals with giftedness in Full-Scale Intelligence…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Gifted Disabled, Intelligence Quotient, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pedder, Hugo; Dias, Sofia; Bennetts, Margherita; Boucher, Martin; Welton, Nicky J. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Background: Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) is increasingly used to inform drug-development decisions by synthesising results from multiple studies to estimate treatment, dose-response, and time-course characteristics. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is used in Health Technology Appraisals for simultaneously comparing effects of multiple treatments,…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Guidelines, Drug Therapy, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leahy, Joy; Walsh, Cathal – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
If IPD is available for some or all trials in a network meta-analysis (NMA), then incorporating this IPD into an NMA is routinely considered to be preferable. However, the situation often arises where a researcher has IPD for trials concerning a particular treatment (eg, from a sponsor) but none for other trials. Therefore, one can reweight the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis, Bayesian Statistics, Network Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Curtin, François – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Meta-analysis can necessitate the combination of parallel and cross-over trial designs. Because of the differences in the trial designs and potential biases notably associated with the crossover trials, one often combines trials of the same designs only, which decreases the power of the meta-analysis. To combine results of clinical trials from…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Least Squares Statistics, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Béliveau, Audrey; Goring, Sarah; Platt, Robert W.; Gustafson, Paul – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
In network meta-analysis, the use of fixed baseline treatment effects (a priori independent) in a contrast-based approach is regularly preferred to the use of random baseline treatment effects (a priori dependent). That is because, often, there is not a need to model baseline treatment effects, which carry the risk of model misspecification.…
Descriptors: Risk, Network Analysis, Meta Analysis, Outcomes of Treatment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Foster, Colin – Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2018
Achieving fluency in important mathematical procedures is fundamental to students' mathematical development. The usual way to develop procedural fluency is to practise repetitive exercises, but is this the only effective way? This paper reports three quasi-experimental studies carried out in a total of 11 secondary schools involving altogether 528…
Descriptors: Mathematics Achievement, Mathematics Instruction, Comparative Analysis, Quasiexperimental Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schmid, Christopher H.; Trikalinos, Thomas A.; Olkin, Ingram – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
We develop a Bayesian multinomial network meta-analysis model for unordered (nominal) categorical outcomes that allows for partially observed data in which exact event counts may not be known for each category. This model properly accounts for correlations of counts in mutually exclusive categories and enables proper comparison and ranking of…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Correlation, Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2