Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Computational Linguistics | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Natural Language Processing | 2 |
| Prediction | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Reading Processes | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Crossley, Scott A. | 1 |
| Dascalu, Mihai | 1 |
| Kyle, Kristopher | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
| Nahatame, Shingo | 1 |
| Skalicky, Stephen | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dale Chall Readability Formula | 1 |
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nahatame, Shingo – Language Learning, 2021
Although text readability has traditionally been measured based on simple linguistic features, recent studies have employed natural language processing techniques to develop new readability formulas that better represent theoretical accounts of reading processes. This study evaluated the construct validity of different readability formulas,…
Descriptors: Readability, Natural Language Processing, Readability Formulas, Reading Processes
Crossley, Scott A.; Skalicky, Stephen; Dascalu, Mihai; McNamara, Danielle S.; Kyle, Kristopher – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
Research has identified a number of linguistic features that influence the reading comprehension of young readers; yet, less is known about whether and how these findings extend to adult readers. This study examines text comprehension, processing, and familiarity judgment provided by adult readers using a number of different approaches (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reading Comprehension, Readability, Adults

Peer reviewed
Direct link
