Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 5 |
Individual Testing | 5 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 5 |
Group Testing | 3 |
Adaptive Testing | 2 |
Branching | 2 |
Computer Oriented Programs | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Response Style (Tests) | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Weiss, David J. | 2 |
Desrochers, Marcie N. | 1 |
Fink, Herbert C. | 1 |
Kimmerling, Joe | 1 |
Neidermeyer, Fred C. | 1 |
Scafe, Marla G. | 1 |
Sullivan, Howard J. | 1 |
Thomas, Andrea | 1 |
Tung, Wendy | 1 |
Vale, C. David | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Scafe, Marla G. – American Journal of Business Education, 2011
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of group testing as a pedagogical technique to enhance learning in a difficult subject such as statistics. Individual test scores were compared to their group test scores for the same, identical test. A t test was used to compare the scores for 157 randomly selected MBA students enrolled…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Testing, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Desrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing

Neidermeyer, Fred C.; Sullivan, Howard J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
Results of the study indicate that the 3-choice, selected-response tests often utilized in programs of this type do not provide an accurate indication of end-of-year achievement for many children, and their continued use is not recommended. (Authors)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Grade 1, Group Testing

Vale, C. David; Weiss, David J. – 1977
Twenty multiple-choice vocabulary items and 20 free-response vocabulary items were administered to 660 college students. The free-response items consisted of the stem words of the multiple-choice items. Testees were asked to respond to the free-response items with synonyms. A computer algorithm was developed to transform the numerous…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Aptitude Tests
Weiss, David J. – 1976
Three and one-half years of research on computerized ability testing are summarized. The original objectives of the research were: (1) to develop and implement the stratified computer-based ability test; (2) to compare, on psychometric criteria, the various approaches to computer-based ability testing, including the stratified computerized test,…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Branching, Comparative Analysis