Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Item Sampling | 3 |
| Norms | 3 |
| Standardized Tests | 3 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBrandenburg, Dale C.; Forsyth, Robert A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Item Sampling, Models
Peer reviewedBrandenburg, Dale C.; Forsyth, Robert A. – Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Item Sampling, Mathematical Models
PDF pending restorationHill, Richard K. – 1974
When norming tests, it may be preferable to use the matrix sampling technique. The results from the samples may be used to estimate what the distribution of scores would have been if each subject had taken all the items. This paper compares four methods for making these estimates. The sample size made it possible to compare the techniques in a…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Item Sampling
