Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 9 |
Individual Differences | 9 |
Reading Research | 9 |
Reading Comprehension | 4 |
Reading Instruction | 4 |
Reading Processes | 3 |
Word Recognition | 3 |
Dyslexia | 2 |
Inferences | 2 |
Language Processing | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Reading Research Quarterly | 3 |
Discourse Processes: A… | 1 |
Early Child Development and… | 1 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
China | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McNamara, Danielle S. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
This article provides a commentary within the special issue, Integration: The Keystone of Comprehension. According to most contemporary frameworks, a driving force in comprehension is the reader's ability to generate the links among the words and sentences (ideas) in the texts and between the ideas in the text and what the readers already know. As…
Descriptors: Inferences, Language Processing, Reading Comprehension, Reading Research
McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2020
This article provides a commentary within the special issue, Integration: The Keystone of Comprehension. According to most contemporary frameworks, a driving force in comprehension is the reader's ability to generate the links among the words and sentences (ideas) in the texts and between the ideas in the text and what the readers already know. As…
Descriptors: Inferences, Language Processing, Reading Comprehension, Reading Research
Xiong, Jianping; Yu, Lili; Veldre, Aaron; Reichle, Erik D.; Andrews, Sally – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2023
In this study, we examined the effects of word and character frequency across three commonly used word-identification tasks (lexical decision, naming, and sentence reading) using the same set of two-character target words (N = 60) and participants (N = 82). Facilitatory effects of word frequency were observed across all three tasks. The…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Orthographic Symbols, Chinese, Correlation

McDougall, Sine J. P.; Ellis, Andrew W. – Early Child Development and Care, 1994
Reviews some findings obtained through comparisons of dyslexic readers with nondyslexic readers matched by chronological or reading age. Notes some of the problems and pitfalls associated with this approach. Explores the potential of other group comparisons when examining sources of reading difficulty, and discusses individual differences within…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Dyslexia, Individual Differences, Reading Difficulties

Elbro, Carsten – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1991
Comparison of the individual reading strategies of 26 severely impaired developmental dyslexics and 26 nonhandicapped readers found a distribution of skills and strategies over a continuum in both groups. Dyslexic students were specifically impaired in phonological processing, and half of them employed more whole-word oriented strategies than the…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Dyslexia, Individual Differences

Vinsonhaler, John F.; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1983
Discusses a series of six studies that investigated the performance of 66 reading and learning disabilities specialists and classroom teachers who diagnosed simulated reading or learning disability cases and suggested remediation plans. Results indicate that both commonality and individual agreement among participants was very low. (AEA)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Individual Differences, Learning Disabilities, Reading Consultants

Stanovich, Keith E. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1980
A review of interactive models of reading combined with the assumption of compensatory processes indicates that compared to poor readers, good readers appear to have superior strategies for comprehending and remembering large units of text and are superior at context-free word recognition. (MKM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Context Clues, High Achievement, Individual Differences

Dole, Janice A.; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1996
Examines group and individual differences arising from strategy instruction. Finds support for strategy instruction for at-risk students. Finds also that students' motivation can influence their use of the instruction they receive. Raises critical questions regarding the role of motivation in strategy instruction and use. (RS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, High Risk Students, Individual Differences, Instructional Effectiveness
Wilkinson, Louise Cherry; Spinelli, Francesca – 1981
A study investigated 35 third grade students' requests and responses in their reading groups to determine (1) whether peer instructional groups designed to differ according to reading ability do, in fact, differ on measures of reading achievement; (2) how the processes of interaction, particularly requests and responses, differ in these groups;…
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Comparative Analysis, Grade 3, Grouping (Instructional Purposes)