Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 11 |
Probability | 11 |
Reinforcement | 11 |
Animals | 6 |
Experiments | 5 |
Intervals | 5 |
Stimuli | 5 |
Behavior | 3 |
Responses | 3 |
Behavior Problems | 2 |
Decision Making | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of the Experimental… | 6 |
Developmental Psychology | 1 |
Developmental Science | 1 |
Journal of Applied Behavior… | 1 |
Learning and Motivation | 1 |
Psychological Record | 1 |
Author
Davison, Michael | 2 |
Nevin, John A. | 2 |
Odum, Amy L. | 2 |
Shahan, Timothy A. | 2 |
Allen, Ron | 1 |
Biondi, Dawn R. | 1 |
Elliffe, Douglas | 1 |
Eppinger, Ben | 1 |
Heekeren, Hauke R. | 1 |
Iwata, Brian A. | 1 |
Kawashima, Kentaro | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rodriguez Buritica, Julia M.; Eppinger, Ben; Schuck, Nicolas W.; Heekeren, Hauke R.; Li, Shu-Chen – Developmental Science, 2016
Observational learning is an important mechanism for cognitive and social development. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying observational learning in children are not well understood. In this study, we used a probabilistic reward-based observational learning paradigm to compare behavioral and electrophysiological markers of…
Descriptors: Correlation, Children, Observational Learning, Reinforcement
Stagner, Jessica P.; Laude, Jennifer R.; Zentall, Thomas R. – Learning and Motivation, 2011
When pigeons are given a choice between two alternatives, one leading to a stimulus 20% of the time that always signals reinforcement (S+) or another stimulus 80% of the time that signals no reinforcement (S-), and the other alternative leading to one of two stimuli each signaling reinforcement 50% of the time, they show a strong preference for…
Descriptors: Animals, Reinforcement, Probability, Stimuli
Mazur, James E.; Biondi, Dawn R. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2011
Parallel experiments with rats and pigeons examined reasons for previous findings that in choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers, rats' choices were affected by the time between trials whereas pigeons' choices were not. In both experiments, the animals chose between a standard alternative and an adjusting alternative. A choice of the…
Descriptors: Animals, Intervals, Psychological Patterns, Probability
Thomason-Sassi, Jessica L.; Iwata, Brian A.; Neidert, Pamela L.; Roscoe, Eileen M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2011
Dependent variables in research on problem behavior typically are based on measures of response repetition, but these measures may be problematic when behavior poses high risk or when its occurrence terminates a session. We examined response latency as the index of behavior during assessment. In Experiment 1, we compared response rate and latency…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Reaction Time, Functional Behavioral Assessment, Experiments
Ward, Ryan D.; Odum, Amy L. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
The present experiment developed a methodology for assessing sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency. Four pigeons responded under a multiple schedule of matching-to-sample components in which the ratio of reinforcers for correct S[subscript 1] and S[subscript 2] responses was…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Experiments, Comparative Analysis, Stimuli
Kupfer, Anne; Allen, Ron; Malagodi, E. F. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
Adjunctive or induced behavior is generated during a variety of schedules of reinforcement. Several theoretical conceptualizations suggest that rate of reinforcement is the primary variable controlling the strength or levels of induced behavior. The operant response requirement within the schedule context has not been extensively studied as a…
Descriptors: Food, Reinforcement, Scheduling, Responses
Elliffe, Douglas; Davison, Michael; Landon, Jason – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
One assumption of the matching approach to choice is that different independent variables control choice independently of each other. We tested this assumption for reinforcer rate and magnitude in an extensive parametric experiment. Five pigeons responded for food reinforcement on switching-key concurrent variable-interval variable-interval…
Descriptors: Criteria, Statistical Analysis, Reinforcement, Models
Kawashima, Kentaro – Psychological Record, 2004
This study investigates sequential dependencies in interresponse times (IRTs) produced by human subjects under random-ratio (RR) and staircase stochastic reinforcement of waiting (staircase SRW) schedules using autocorrelation and relative frequencies of IRT[subscript n] *IRT[subscript n+1] pairs. In the first of two experiments conducted for this…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Probability, Item Response Theory, Experiments

Myers, Nancy Angrist – Developmental Psychology, 1972
A study of probability learning using a noncontingent binary prediction situation to evaluate the effect of pretraining reinforcement schedule. (author/MB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary School Students, Expectation, Learning
Odum, Amy L.; Shahan, Timothy A.; Nevin, John A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2005
This experiment examined the effects of reinforcement probability on resistance to change of remembering and response rate. Pigeons responded on a two- component multiple schedule in which completion of a variable-interval 20-s schedule produced delayed matching-to-sample trials in both components. Each session included four delays (0.1 s, 2 s, 4…
Descriptors: Memory, Probability, Reinforcement, Intervals
Nevin, John A.; Davison, Michael; Shahan, Timothy A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2005
A model of conditional discrimination performance (Davison & Nevin, 1999) is combined with the notion that unmeasured attending to the sample and comparison stimuli, in the steady state and during disruption, depends on reinforcement in the same way as predicted for overt free-operant responding by behavioral momentum theory (Nevin & Grace, 2000).…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Behavior Problems, Stimuli, Probability