NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lehan, Tara; Hussey, Heather; Mika, Eva – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2016
Throughout the dissertation process, the chair and committee members provide feedback regarding quality to help the doctoral candidate to produce the highest-quality document and become an independent scholar. Nevertheless, results of previous research suggest that overall dissertation quality generally is poor. Because much of the feedback about…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Van Den Heuvel, Ellen; Botting, Nicola; Boudewijns, Inge; Manders, Eric; Swillen, Ann; Zink, Inge – First Language, 2017
This study investigated three conversational subskills in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS, n = 8, ages 7-13) and Williams syndrome (WS, n = 8, ages 6-12). The researchers re-evaluated these subskills after 18 to 24 months and compared them to those of peers with idiopathic intellectual disability (IID) and IID and comorbid…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Communication Skills, Comparative Analysis, Comorbidity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rakap, Salih; Snyder, Patricia; Pasia, Cathleen – Behavioral Disorders, 2014
Debate is occurring about which result interpretation aides focused on examining the experimental effect should be used in single-subject experimental research. In this study, we examined seven nonoverlap methods and compared results using each method to judgments of two visual analysts. The data sources for the present study were 36 studies…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Experiments, Research Problems, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wainer, Howard; Thissen, David – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
A class of naive estimators of correlation was tested for robustness, accuracy, and efficiency against Pearson's r, Tukey's r, and Spearman's r. It was found that this class of estimators seems to be superior, being less affected by outliers, reasonably efficient, and frequently more easily calculated. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Goodness of Fit, Nonparametric Statistics