Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Statistical Inference | 3 |
| Statistical Studies | 3 |
| Analysis of Covariance | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cook, Thomas D. | 1 |
| Eisermann, Jens | 1 |
| Hsieh, Chueh-An | 1 |
| Maier, Kimberly S. | 1 |
| Pohl, Steffi | 1 |
| Soellner, Renate | 1 |
| Steiner, Peter M. | 1 |
| Woodruff, David | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany (Berlin) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hsieh, Chueh-An; Maier, Kimberly S. – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2009
The capacity of Bayesian methods in estimating complex statistical models is undeniable. Bayesian data analysis is seen as having a range of advantages, such as an intuitive probabilistic interpretation of the parameters of interest, the efficient incorporation of prior information to empirical data analysis, model averaging and model selection.…
Descriptors: Equal Education, Bayesian Statistics, Data Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Pohl, Steffi; Steiner, Peter M.; Eisermann, Jens; Soellner, Renate; Cook, Thomas D. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2009
Adjustment methods such as propensity scores and analysis of covariance are often used for estimating treatment effects in nonexperimental data. Shadish, Clark, and Steiner used a within-study comparison to test how well these adjustments work in practice. They randomly assigned participating students to a randomized or nonrandomized experiment.…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Social Science Research, Statistical Bias, Statistical Inference
Woodruff, David – 1993
Two analyses of variance (ANOVA) models for item scores are compared. The first is an items by subject random effect ANOVA. The second is a mixed effects ANOVA with items fixed and subjects random. Comparisons regarding reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, psychometric inference, and inter-item covariance structure are made between the…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis

Peer reviewed
Direct link
