Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 5 |
Statistical Studies | 5 |
Test Theory | 5 |
Equated Scores | 2 |
Mathematical Models | 2 |
Raw Scores | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Simulation | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Cope, Ronald T. | 1 |
Fitzpatrick, Steven J. | 1 |
Jansen, Margo G. H. | 1 |
Morrison, Carol A. | 1 |
Sarvela, Paul D. | 1 |
Williams, Richard H. | 1 |
Zimmerman, Donald W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Williams, Richard H.; Zimmerman, Donald W. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1982
The reliability of simple difference scores is greater than, less than, or equal to that of residualized difference scores, depending on whether the correlation between pretest and posttest scores is greater than, less than, or equal to the ratio of the standard deviations of pretest and posttest scores. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Pretests Posttests
Morrison, Carol A.; Fitzpatrick, Steven J. – 1992
An attempt was made to determine which item response theory (IRT) equating method results in the least amount of equating error or "scale drift" when equating scores across one or more test forms. An internal anchor test design was employed with five different test forms, each consisting of 30 items, 10 in common with the base test and 5…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement
Cope, Ronald T. – 1986
Comparisons were made of three Angoff Design V linear equating methods (two forms equated to a common test, two forms predicted by a common test, or two forms used to predict a common test) and Tucker's and R. Levine's linear methods, under common item linear equating with non-equivalent populations. Forms of a professional certification test…
Descriptors: Certification, Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores, Higher Education

Jansen, Margo G. H. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1986
In this paper a Bayesian procedure is developed for the simultaneous estimation of the reading ability and difficulty parameters which are assumed to be factors in reading errors by the multiplicative Poisson Model. According to several criteria, the Bayesian estimates are better than comparable maximum likelihood estimates. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Sarvela, Paul D. – 1986
Four discrimination indices were compared, using score distributions which were normal, bimodal, and negatively skewed. The score distributions were systematically varied to represent the common circumstances of a military training situation using criterion-referenced mastery tests. Three 20-item tests were administered to 110 simulated subjects.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Item Analysis, Mastery Tests