Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 9 |
Objective Tests | 9 |
Test Items | 9 |
Difficulty Level | 5 |
Scoring | 5 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 4 |
Student Evaluation | 4 |
Test Construction | 4 |
Test Use | 4 |
Academic Standards | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Ministerial Council on… | 3 |
American Journal of… | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Instructional… | 1 |
Author
Donovan, Jenny | 3 |
Lennon, Melissa | 3 |
Hutton, Penny | 2 |
Morrissey, Noni | 2 |
O'Connor, Gayl | 2 |
Anderson, Paul S. | 1 |
Dolinsky, Donna | 1 |
Frisbie, David A. | 1 |
Maihoff, N. A. | 1 |
Mehrens, Wm. A. | 1 |
Reid, Vincent E. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 6 | 3 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Australia | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tasdemir, Mehmet – Journal of Instructional Psychology, 2010
This study aims at comparing the difficulty levels, discrimination powers and powers of testing achievement of multiple choice tests and true-false tests, and thus revealing the rightness or wrongness of the commonly believed hypothesis that multiple choice tests don't bear the same properties as true-false tests. The research was performed with…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests, Student Evaluation

Dolinsky, Donna; Reid, Vincent E. – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1984
Cognitive learning and cognitive measures are defined and various types of objective measures of cognitive learning are discussed and compared, including short answer test items, true-false items, multiple choice items, matching items, and written simulations. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques

Tsai, Fu-Ju; Suen, Hoi K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993
Six methods of scoring multiple true-false items were compared in terms of reliabilities, difficulties, and discrimination. Results suggest that, for norm-referenced score interpretations, there is insufficient evidence to support any one of the methods as superior. For criterion-referenced score interpretations, effects of scoring method must be…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests)

Frisbie, David A.; Sweeney, Daryl C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
A 100-item five-choice multiple choice (MC) biology final exam was converted to multiple choice true-false (MTF) form to yield two content-parallel test forms comprised of the two item types. Students found the MTF items easier and preferred MTF over MC; the MTF subtests were more reliable. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Biology, College Science, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Anderson, Paul S. – 1987
Seven formats of educational testing were compared for student test preferences and how well each evaluated learning. The formats were: (1) true/false; (2) multiple choice; (3) matching; (4) MDT Multiple Digit Testing, in which a machine scores fill-in-the-blanks; (5) fill-in-the-blanks; (6) short answers; and (7) essay. A total of 1,440 survey…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Essay Tests
Donovan, Jenny; Hutton, Penny; Lennon, Melissa; O'Connor, Gayl; Morrissey, Noni – Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (NJ1), 2008
In July 2001, the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) agreed to the development of assessment instruments and key performance measures for reporting on student skills, knowledge and understandings in primary science. It directed the newly established Performance Measurement and Reporting Taskforce…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scientific Literacy, Media Literacy, Scientific Concepts
Maihoff, N. A.; Mehrens, Wm. A. – 1985
A comparison is presented of alternate-choice and true-false item forms used in an undergraduate natural science course. The alternate-choice item is a modified two-choice multiple-choice item in which the two responses are included within the question stem. This study (1) compared the difficulty level, discrimination level, reliability, and…
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing
Donovan, Jenny; Lennon, Melissa; O'Connor, Gayl; Morrissey, Noni – Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (NJ1), 2008
In 2003 the first nationally-comparable science assessment was designed, developed and carried out under the auspices of the national council of education ministers, the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). In 2006 a second science assessment was conducted and, for the first time nationally, the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scientific Literacy, Science Achievement, Comparative Analysis
Wu, Margaret; Donovan, Jenny; Hutton, Penny; Lennon, Melissa – Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (NJ1), 2008
In July 2001, the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) agreed to the development of assessment instruments and key performance measures for reporting on student skills, knowledge and understandings in primary science. It directed the newly established Performance Measurement and Reporting Taskforce…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scientific Literacy, Science Achievement, Comparative Analysis