NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schmidt, Henk G.; Baars, Gerard J. A.; Hermus, Peter; van der Molen, Henk T.; Arnold, Ivo J. M.; Smeets, Guus – European Journal of Higher Education, 2022
The purpose of the study reported here was to observe the effects of examination practices on the extent to which university students procrastinate. These examination practices were: (1) limiting the number of resits, (2) compensatory rather than conjunctive decision-making about student progress, and (3) restricting the time available for…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Study Habits, Decision Making, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seedhouse, Paul – ELT Journal, 2019
This article investigates the central role of topic in the IELTS Speaking Test (IST). Topic has developed a dual personality in this interactional setting: topic-as-script is the scripted statement of topic on the examiner's cards prior to the interaction, whereas topic-as-action is how topic is developed by the candidate during the course of the…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Language Tests, Second Language Learning, Personality Traits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vecchione, Michele; Alessandri, Guido; Barbaranelli, Claudio – Assessment, 2012
This study investigates the measurement equivalence of a five-factor measure of personality across two groups applying for jobs, who completed the same questionnaire using either a paper-and-pencil (n = 429) or a web online answer format (n = 651). The data were collected using the Big Five Questionnaire-2 (BFQ-2; which is a measure of the Five…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Personality Assessment, Computer Assisted Testing, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stenlund, Tova; Jönsson, Fredrik U.; Jonsson, Bert – Educational Psychology, 2017
This paper focuses on the factors that are likely to play a role in individual learning outcomes from group discussions, and it includes a comparison featuring test-enhanced learning. A between-groups design (N = 98) was used to examine the learning effects of feedback if provided to discussion groups, and to examine whether group discussions…
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Tests, Outcomes of Education, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hayes, Heather; Embretson, Susan E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2013
Online and on-demand tests are increasingly used in assessment. Although the main focus has been cheating and test security (e.g., Selwyn, 2008) the cross-setting equivalence of scores as a function of contrasting test conditions is also an issue that warrants attention. In this study, the impact of environmental and cognitive distractions, as…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Problem Solving, Physical Environment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hedricks, Cynthia A.; Robie, Chet; Harnisher, John V. – International Journal of Testing, 2008
Personality scores were used to construct three databases of global norms. The composition of the three databases varied according to percentage of cases by global region, occupational group, applicant status, and gender of the job candidate. Comparison of personality scores across the three norms databases revealed that the magnitude of the…
Descriptors: Norms, Databases, Case Studies, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kabacoff, Robert I. – International Journal of Testing, 2008
With the growth of globalization, organizations are facing an increased challenge to manage talent, improve employee engagement, develop effective teams, create succession pipelines, and increase organizational effectiveness in multinational settings. Given the need to evaluate and compare individuals from more than one country using standardized…
Descriptors: Motivation, Local Norms, Foreign Countries, Organizational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meyer, Kevin D.; Foster, Jeff L. – International Journal of Testing, 2008
With the increasing globalization of human resources practices, a commensurate increase in demand has occurred for multi-language ("global") personality norms for use in selection and development efforts. The combination of data from multiple translations of a personality assessment into a single norm engenders error from multiple sources. This…
Descriptors: Global Approach, Cultural Differences, Norms, Human Resources
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bartram, Dave – International Journal of Testing, 2008
The article discusses issues relating to the international use of personality inventories, especially those in which organizations make comparisons between people from differing cultures or countries or those with different languages. The focus is on the issue of norming and the use of national versus multinational norms. It is noted that…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Norms, Cultural Differences, Global Approach
Nering, Michael L., Ed.; Ostini, Remo, Ed. – Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010
This comprehensive "Handbook" focuses on the most used polytomous item response theory (IRT) models. These models help us understand the interaction between examinees and test questions where the questions have various response categories. The book reviews all of the major models and includes discussions about how and where the models…
Descriptors: Guides, Item Response Theory, Test Items, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ramesh, Anuradha; Hazucha, Joy F.; Bank, Jurgen – International Journal of Testing, 2008
A major challenge that decisions makers face in multi-national organizations is how to compare managers from different parts of the globe. This challenge is both psychometric and practical. We draw on the cross-cultural psychology literature to propose a three-step framework to compare personality data from different countries. The first step…
Descriptors: Personality, Norms, Psychometrics, International Organizations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mehryar, A. H.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975
Eysenck's PEN Inventory and Lanyon's Psychological Screening Inventory were given to groups of male and female American undergraduates from a state university. A factorial analysis of the intercorrelations showed that three major factors could account for the bulk of correlations among the nine differently labeled characteristics covered by the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Neurosis, Personality Assessment
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Lederman, Edward – 1971
The forced-choice and a questionnaire format of the Thorndike Dimensions of Temperament were administered under regular and desirability directions to college students. The forced-choice format produced low scale intercorrelations under the regular directions, but under the desirability directions a common factor appeared. The same factor appeared…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Behavior Rating Scales, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoffmann, Norman G.; Butcher, James N. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975
Three Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory short forms, the Mini-Mult, Faschingbauer's 166, and the MMPI-168, which were constructed by different methodologies, were compared on a sample of 1,028 psychiatric patients. Results of this study seriously question the use of MMPI short forms for clinical interpretation. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Personality Measures, Psychological Testing, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martin, William A. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1971
An attempt to secure further evidence for, or against, the intellectual explanation of Maori superiority in word fluency. (WY)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Ethnic Groups, High School Students, Intelligence
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2