Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Beginning Teachers | 1 |
| Childrens Writing | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Experienced Teachers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Barkaoui, Khaled | 1 |
| Daniel, Cathy | 1 |
| Dellinger, Amy | 1 |
| Denny, R. Kenton | 1 |
| Powers, Taylor | 1 |
| Stuhlmann, Janice | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBarkaoui, Khaled – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2011
This study examined the effects of marking method and rater experience on ESL (English as a Second Language) essay test scores and rater performance. Each of 31 novice and 29 experienced raters rated a sample of ESL essays both holistically and analytically. Essay scores were analysed using a multi-faceted Rasch model to compare test-takers'…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Essay Tests, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewedStuhlmann, Janice; Daniel, Cathy; Dellinger, Amy; Denny, R. Kenton; Powers, Taylor – Reading Psychology, 1999
Investigates whether training raters to interpret the scoring dimensions on a rubric would increase reliability. Compares two groups of kindergarten and first-grade teachers: one group with training, one without. Finds that training increases raters' abilities to reliably interpret scoring items. (SC)
Descriptors: Childrens Writing, Comparative Analysis, Generalizability Theory, Grade 1
