Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 23 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 82 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 179 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 254 |
| Reputation | 254 |
| Higher Education | 111 |
| Foreign Countries | 110 |
| Institutional Characteristics | 87 |
| Educational Quality | 66 |
| Universities | 61 |
| Institutional Evaluation | 52 |
| College Faculty | 49 |
| Student Attitudes | 35 |
| College Choice | 25 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Webster, David S. | 6 |
| Kayyali, Mustafa | 3 |
| Soh, Kaycheng | 3 |
| Campbell, Jill F. | 2 |
| Heyman, Gail D. | 2 |
| Lee, Kang | 2 |
| Mampaey, Jelle | 2 |
| Overall, J. U. | 2 |
| Soh, Kay Cheng | 2 |
| Spiro, Louis M. | 2 |
| Abouserie, Hossam Eldin… | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| United States | 14 |
| United Kingdom | 13 |
| China | 10 |
| Australia | 7 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Europe | 5 |
| Germany | 5 |
| Japan | 5 |
| South Africa | 5 |
| Africa | 3 |
| Chile | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 1 |
| General Educational… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGilley, J. Wade – Academe, 1992
Rankings of colleges and universities in the popular press have two problems: (1) they are gimmicks to sell publications; and (2) institutions have become pawns, juggling numbers in quest of higher rankings, the ethical equivalent of cheating. Higher education must return to truth, fairness, and honesty to regain its purpose and integrity. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Educational Quality, Ethics
Gini, Al – Continuing Higher Education Review, 2008
This article presents a keynote address delivered by Al Gini, Professor of Business Ethics in the School of Business Administration at Loyola University in Chicago, at the University Continuing Education Association (UCEA) 93rd Annual Conference, March 26, 2008, New Orleans, Louisiana, on the topic of "Liberal Education in an Interdependent…
Descriptors: General Education, Liberal Arts, Majors (Students), Reputation
Webster, David S. – 1984
The "Flexner Report" of 1910, which described 155 U.S. and Canadian medical schools, is discussed, along with its influence on later studies of academic quality. Scholars almost universally agree that the Flexner Report dramatically changed the nature of medical education in the United States, although they disagree about how this…
Descriptors: Colleges, Comparative Analysis, Educational History, Educational Quality
Geraghty, Mary; Guernsey, Lisa – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1997
In response to the controversial college rankings published in national magazines, Stanford University (California) has posted some of the statistics used in the "U.S. News and World Report" on its World Wide Web site. It encourages other institutions to do the same to make the information readily available without the perceived…
Descriptors: College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Information Dissemination
Peer reviewedBullough, Vern L.; And Others – Journal of Professional Nursing, 1989
Biographies of 177 American nursing leaders who were born before 1890 r deceased by 1988 were analyzed to identify commonalities in their backgrounds. Similarities in background characteristics were found when they were compared with achievers of Renaissance Italy, eighteenth-century Scotland, and nineteenth-century German Jews. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Authors, Background, Biographies, Comparative Analysis
Johnson, Linda L. – 1978
Prestige-suggestion, the effect that the prestige or reputation of a source has on a receiver, is the subject of this paper. Three research studies which have been done recently by researchers in reading are reported. These studies asked the following questions: If consumers evaluate products by means of reading store advertisements, will they be…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewedHeveron, Eileen D. – Review of Higher Education, 1987
The factors that played a major role in the rapid improvement of academic departments at eight major research universities are explored. Five improvement strategies are identified: departmental hiring practices, funding, leadership, strategic planning, and overall institutional reputation. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Comparative Analysis, Department Heads, Departments
Foster, Merle A. – Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior, 1926
The plan adopted in this study has been: (1) to make a correlation between the ranking of the various States in each of the items compared; and (2) to compare the various States with each other directly with a reference to the mean of the entire United States in those items. The Pearson coefficient of correlation points out the approximate degree…
Descriptors: Illiteracy, Correlation, Reputation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedWebster, David S.; Skinner, Tad – Change, 1996
A discussion of the National Research Council's 1995 ranking of research-doctorate programs in the United States criticizes the report for what it does not address, particularly comparisons with the information it disseminated in a 1982 report, some data discrepancies, and central issues such as an institution's available methods of instruction,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Doctoral Programs, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewedWebster, David S. – Change, 1986
Quality rankings of undergraduate institutions and programs do exist although they are hard to find and often ignored. The accuracy of these ratings and how they can be improved are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Educational Quality
Peer reviewedWebster, David S. – Change, 1983
The five-volume Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States, the most authoritative academic quality ranking ever done, is discussed. The Assessment covers 2,699 programs in 32 disciplines and assesses a faculty's reputation for scholarly quality. Improvements in programs' reputations are also discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Doctoral Programs, Educational Quality, Graduate Study
Peer reviewedDixon, David N.; Vrochopoulos, Sam; Burton, Jennifer – Counseling Psychologist, 1997
Examines the adequacy of descriptions of counseling psychology and its professionals in introductory psychology textbooks compared to the descriptions of other applied areas of psychology. Results indicate that counseling psychology is less represented than industrial or organizational and clinical psychology and more represented than school…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Counseling Psychology, Introductory Courses
Peer reviewedKirk, Stuart A.; Corcoran, Kevin – Journal of Social Work Education, 1995
A 1994 "U.S. News and World Report" ranking of professional schools of social work is examined and compared with the findings of 8 other attempts to rank social work schools in the last 20 years. Results indicate that the assessment measures used were primarily faculty products (for example, articles published), and that the reputational…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedTerkla, Dawn Geronimo; Pagano, Marian F. – Research in Higher Education, 1993
The use of a semantic differential measure to investigate the institutional image of Tufts University (Massachusetts), both internal and external, is reported. The study focused on (1) differences between the current and desired image, and (2) differences among alumni, current student, and other constituencies' views of the institution.…
Descriptors: Alumni, Attitude Measures, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedBaughman, James C.; Goldman, Robert N. – Change, 1999
Reports an exploratory study of the relationship between faculty publishing rates in basic and applied-research journals and institutional ranking based on 1995 data for 1,318 four-year colleges and universities. Results reveal a strong, positive association between scholarship and institutional ranking, with some interesting exceptions. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Applicants, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria


