Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 23 |
| Concurrent Validity | 23 |
| Intelligence Tests | 14 |
| Test Validity | 11 |
| Preschool Children | 6 |
| Preschool Education | 6 |
| Elementary Education | 5 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Achievement Tests | 3 |
| Adults | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Beck, Brett | 1 |
| Benedict, Ralph H. B. | 1 |
| Bower, Anna | 1 |
| Boyle, Gregory J. | 1 |
| Bradley-Johnson, Sharon | 1 |
| Buse, Sylvia T. | 1 |
| Chew, Alex L. | 1 |
| Chrisman, Sabine M. | 1 |
| Faust, Douglas S. | 1 |
| Hayes, Alan | 1 |
| Heath, Charles P. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 21 |
| Journal Articles | 16 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 3 |
| Counselors | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSpruill, Jean; Beck, Brett – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
This study is a concurrent validation of Level II of the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised (WRAT-R) using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale IQ scores as criterion measures. Forty-five subjects were administered the WAIS-R and WRAT-R and their scores correlated. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adults, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewedHeath, Charles P.; Obrzut, John E. – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Examined relationship of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised), (WISC-R), and the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery (W-JPB), Part Two, using children (N=34) with learning disabilities. Found more consistent relationships between WISC-R and W-JPB Achievement tests than…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedChew, Alex L.; Morris, John D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
The validity of the Lollipop Test: A Diagnostic Screening Test of School Readiness was examined for 129 pre-kindergarten subjects using the Developmental Indicator for the Assessment of Learning as the criterion. Concurrent validity was demonstrated across the test batteries. The Lollipop Test appears to be an attractive alternative…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Kindergarten, Preschool Children
Bower, Anna; Hayes, Alan – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1995
This study compared global scores of 26 Australian students (ages 4 to 16) with mental retardation on the third and fourth editions of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Analysis indicated a fairly strong positive relation between the two tests, suggesting that the fourth edition may be substituted for the older instrument in longitudinal…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedShanahan, Richard; Bradley-Johnson, Sharon – Journal of School Psychology, 1992
Examined concurrent validity of Nonvocal Cognitive Quotient (NVCQ) of Cognitive Abilities Scale (CAS) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (Binet IV) for two and three year olds. Found adequate concurrent validity for CAS NVCQ and Binet IV Verbal Comprehension at both age levels as well as for Nonverbal Reasoning/Visualization…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewedRothlisberg, Barbara A. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Examined concurrent validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edition (SB IV) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) in a homogeneous, nonexceptional sample of 32 early elementary school children. Findings suggest that SB IV has significant positive relationship with WISC-R. The tests displayed a moderate level…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedZucker, Steven; Riordan, Jean – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Examined concurrent validity of several new and revised conceptual language measures. Administered Bracken Basic Concept Scale (BBCS), Boehm Test of Basic Concepts-Preschool Version (Boehm-PV) or Boehm-Revised, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) to 99 preschool children attending kindergarten screening. BBCS correlated significantly…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Language Acquisition, Language Aptitude
Oakes, Jane; Faust, Douglas S. – 1990
The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) has recently undergone a major revision and restandardization to update its 20-year-old norms, extend the age range down to age 3 and up to age 7 years, update and revise its test items, and increase its appeal to young children. This paper presents the results of a concurrent…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests
Sapp, Gary L.; And Others – 1985
The concurrent validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) was examined by comparing K-ABC scores and Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised (WISC-R) scores for 58 school children in primary and intermediate grades. Thirty-seven of these children had either educable mental retardation, learning disabilities, or…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Correlation
Peer reviewedKrohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Investigated validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with 89 preschool Head Start children from low-income families, using Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Form LM as criterion measure. Found some support for concurrent and construct validity of both instruments for use with…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Low Income Groups
Peer reviewedBoyle, Gregory J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
Canonical-redundancy analyses were computed across the Profile of Mood States and the Eight State Questionnaire on a sample of 289 college undergraduates in order to estimate the degree of measurement overlap of the two multidimensional mood-state instruments. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Foreign Countries
Buse, Sylvia T.; McCall, Virgil W. – 1988
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were compared using a sample of 26 developmentally disabled children, aged 32 to 73 months. The focus of the study was to determine the feasibility of the K-ABC both for assessment and for planning more effective remediation programs for this…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewedHelmes, Edward – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
Canadian undergraduate students were administered the British general ability test, AH2, along with a multiple-choice vocabulary test and the Standard Progressive Matrices, a nonverbal ability test. Scores were compared with British norms and intercorrelated with those of the other two tests. Correlations with the other ability tests were low.…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedWolf, Fredric M.; And Others – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1991
Five studies involving medical students over a four-year period were conducted to examine the reliability and validity of the Medical Helping Relationship Inventory (MHRI)--an instrument for evaluating medical communication skills. Evidence of the MHRI's construct validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity is discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Construct Validity
Peer reviewedHoffman, Jeffrey D.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1996
Compares the predictive and concurrent validities of a learning efficiency test with that of another test. Memory factor scores of the learning efficiency test correlated significantly with the other test's scores, with class grades, and with actual grade-level functioning in reading. The learning efficiency test's validity compares favorably to…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

