Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 16 |
| Research | 16 |
| Sex Differences | 4 |
| College Students | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Measurement Instruments | 3 |
| Responses | 3 |
| Testing | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Adolescents | 2 |
| Cognitive Development | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychol Rep | 3 |
| Child Study Journal | 1 |
| Home Economics Research… | 1 |
| J Gen Psychol | 1 |
| Journal of Research in… | 1 |
| Mathematics Teaching | 1 |
| Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1 |
| Technological Horizons in… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
| Metropolitan Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Namy, Elmer A. – Psychol Rep, 1969
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Measurement Instruments, Psychological Testing
Schoonover, Sarah M.; Hertel, Richard K. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Testing, Intelligence, Measurement Techniques
Burrell, K.; And Others – Mathematics Teaching, 1975
Students were given practical tests in which they performed mathematical tasks, and written tests covering the same material. In general students scored higher on the practical test than the written test, and there were interaction effects with the order in which the tests were given and with verbal reasoning. (SD)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Mathematics Education, Research, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedYoung, Darrell D. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Science, Comparative Testing, Group Discussion
Greenwald, Herbert J.; Clausen, John D. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Attitudes, College Students, Comparative Testing, Conformity
Peer reviewedJohnson, Roger A. – Child Study Journal, 1977
This study compared scores of 131 deaf and 131 hearing adolescents on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. (SB)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedLandis, Daniel; Slivka, Robert M. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Comparative Testing, Decision Making
Eisenberg, Theodore A. – 1974
A diagnostic computational test given to 22 arithmetic teachers in 1930 was administered to a similar group of 35 elementary school teachers in 1973. The purpose was to compare and contrast computational errors made by the teachers. Findings revealed that 1973 teachers possess, on the average, more computational skills than the 1930 teachers. Both…
Descriptors: Arithmetic, Basic Skills, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing
Holliday, William G. – 1971
Tenth grade biology students were randomly assigned to three groups of 36 students each. Each group was presented with the same learning materials. The material was in a printed format for one group, one group was read the material, and the third read the material while it was read to them. All groups were given a printed retention test, and, when…
Descriptors: Audiovisual Instruction, Auditory Stimuli, Classroom Research, Comparative Testing
Guilford, J. P.; And Others – J Gen Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Association Measures, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Cultural Influences
Hollingshead, Maybelle Clayton; Clayton, Charles – 1971
Designed to investigate the performance of American Indian youth on the "Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children" (WISC) compared to the "Chicago Non-Verbal" (CNV) for the purpose of establishing validity and reliability of the measurement and appraisal tools, this study analyzed test data from 71 Indian youth (aged 11 to 15)…
Descriptors: Adolescents, American Indians, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedCary, Richard T.; Sproles, George B. – Home Economics Research Journal, 1978
The article presents a theoretical framework for evaluating the utility of consumer product testing methods involving four factors which determine a method's utility, validity, reliability, manageability, and essentiality. The framework is applied to three situations, including comparative evaluation of test methods, comparative product testing,…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Consumer Protection, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Feeney, J. D.; And Others – 1968
This experiment investigated the significance of spontaneous occurrence of number symbols in the drawings of 86 (23 male pairs and 20 female pairs) kindergarten children. A comparison was made of first grade achievement on the Piaget Number Concept Test of students who used alphabetic and numeric symbols in the Draw-a-Classroom Test in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Testing, Concept Formation, Kindergarten Children
Resetarits, Paul J. – Technological Horizons in Education, 1989
Studies whether traditional drafting equipment (TRAD) or computer aided drafting equipment (CAD) is more effective. Proposes that students using only CAD can learn principles of drafting as well as students using only TRAD. Reports no significant difference either on achievement or attitude. (MVL)
Descriptors: College Science, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Graphics
Resch, Kenneth Edward – 1972
Results of research performed to determine whether or not newly enrolled freshman students improved after one and one-half quarters of composition instruction at Western Illinois University are presented. Using an essay-type placement test given at initial enrollment as a pre-test, 158 students were selected as the experimental group to write…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Comparative Testing, Course Evaluation, Course Objectives
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

