Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Compliance (Legal) | 2 |
| Dyslexia | 2 |
| Educational Legislation | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Oral Reading | 2 |
| Reading Fluency | 2 |
| Special Education | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Disability Identification | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Gray Oral Reading Test | 2 |
| Kaufman Test of Educational… | 1 |
| Wechsler Individual… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLindstrom, Jennifer H. – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2019
There is often confusion about the terms used to label or describe a reading problem. Clinicians and researchers use different terminology than the schools. For example, medical professionals, psychologists, and other practitioners outside of the school often use the term "dyslexia," "reading disorder," and "specific…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Reading Difficulties, Compliance (Legal), Eligibility
Sheftel, Jenna – ProQuest LLC, 2013
In 2001 the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) mandated that U.S. public schools provide evidence-based practice for individuals with learning disabilities. However, it is unclear whether U.S. public schools have consistently adhered to this mandate. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary evidence regarding whether U.S. public schools…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Theory Practice Relationship, Dyslexia
