Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computation | 2 |
| Geometric Concepts | 2 |
| Numeracy | 2 |
| Pattern Recognition | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Disadvantaged Youth | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Mathematics Instruction | 1 |
| Mathematics Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCheng, Weiyi; Lei, Pui-Wa; DiPerna, James C. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2017
The purpose of the current study was to examine dimensionality and concurrent validity evidence of the EARLI numeracy measures (DiPerna, Morgan, & Lei, 2007), which were developed to assess key skills such as number identification, counting, and basic arithmetic. Two methods (NOHARM with approximate chi-square test and DIMTEST with DETECT…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Numeracy, Mathematics Tests, Statistical Analysis
Thompson, Ian – Mathematics Teaching, 2003
In a recent edition of "Mathematics Teaching" Midge Pasternack argued the case for the use of the 0-99 square with young children rather than the ubiquitous 1-100 square. In this article, the author would like to take the opportunity to mount a defence in favour of the much maligned 1-100 square. His main criticism of the 0-99 square (apart from…
Descriptors: Geometric Concepts, Mathematics Instruction, Young Children, Numeracy
