Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computational Linguistics | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| High School Students | 2 |
| Natural Language Processing | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Cluster Grouping | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Discriminant Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textCrossley, Scott A.; Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2016
This study investigates a novel approach to automatically assessing essay quality that combines natural language processing approaches that assess text features with approaches that assess individual differences in writers such as demographic information, standardized test scores, and survey results. The results demonstrate that combining text…
Descriptors: Essays, Scoring, Writing Evaluation, Natural Language Processing
Direct linkCrossley, Scott A.; Roscoe, Rod; McNamara, Danielle S. – Written Communication, 2014
This study identifies multiple profiles of successful essays via a cluster analysis approach using linguistic features reported by a variety of natural language processing tools. The findings from the study indicate that there are four profiles of successful writers for the samples analyzed. These four profiles are linguistically distinct from one…
Descriptors: Essays, Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, Multivariate Analysis
