Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 2 |
| Reading Improvement | 2 |
| Tutorial Programs | 2 |
| Academic Accommodations… | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Class Size | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Cross Age Teaching | 1 |
| Educational Strategies | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bette Chambers | 1 |
| Levin, Henry M. | 1 |
| Michele K. Logan | 1 |
| Nancy A. Madden | 1 |
| Philip Abrami | 1 |
| Richard Gifford | 1 |
| Robert E. Slavin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Direct linkBette Chambers; Robert E. Slavin; Nancy A. Madden; Philip Abrami; Michele K. Logan; Richard Gifford – Elementary School Journal, 2011
This study evaluated the relative effects of Tier II computer-assisted tutoring in small groups (Team Alphie) and one-to-one tutoring provided to struggling readers in 33 high-poverty Success for All (SFA) schools. In this year-long study, struggling readers in the Team Alphie schools were tutored in groups of 6. In the control schools, students…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Reading Difficulties, Grade 2, Tutoring
Peer reviewedLevin, Henry M.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1987
The cost effectiveness of four approaches to improving mathematics and reading performance of elementary school children is compared. Peer tutoring is found to be more cost-effective than computer-assisted instruction, and both are more cost-effective than reducing class size or increasing the length of the school day. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Class Size, Computer Assisted Instruction, Cost Effectiveness, Cross Age Teaching
