NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pomplun, Mark; Custer, Michael – Applied Measurement in Education, 2005
In this study, we investigated possible context effects when students chose to defer items and answer those items later during a computerized test. In 4 primary school reading tests, 126 items were studied. Logistic regression analyses identified 4 items across 4 grade levels as statistically significant. However, follow-up analyses indicated that…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Reading Tests, Effect Size, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pomplun, Mark; Custer, Michael – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2005
This study investigated the equivalence of scores from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of a series of K-3 reading screening tests. Concerns about score equivalence on the computerized formats were warranted because of the use of reading passages, computer unfamiliarity of primary school students, and teacher versus computer…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Reading Tests, Family Income, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pomplun, Mark; Ritchie, Timothy; Custer, Michael – Educational Assessment, 2006
This study investigated factors related to score differences on computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of a series of primary K-3 reading tests. Factors studied included item and student characteristics. The results suggest that the score differences were more related to student than item characteristics. These student characteristics include…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Student Characteristics, Response Style (Tests), Socioeconomic Status