NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 202512
Since 202436
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 36 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selcuk Acar; Peter Organisciak; Denis Dumas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In this three-study investigation, we applied various approaches to score drawings created in response to both Form A and Form B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural (broadly TTCT-F) as well as the Multi-Trial Creative Ideation task (MTCI). We focused on TTCT-F in Study 1, and utilizing a random forest classifier, we achieved 79% and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Models, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Swapna Haresh Teckwani; Amanda Huee-Ping Wong; Nathasha Vihangi Luke; Ivan Cherh Chiet Low – Advances in Physiology Education, 2024
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, has significantly impacted the educational landscape, offering unique opportunities for learning and assessment. In the realm of written assessment grading, traditionally viewed as a laborious and subjective process, this study sought to…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Reliability, Computational Linguistics, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
William Orwig; Emma R. Edenbaum; Joshua D. Greene; Daniel L. Schacter – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
Recent developments in computerized scoring via semantic distance have provided automated assessments of verbal creativity. Here, we extend past work, applying computational linguistic approaches to characterize salient features of creative text. We hypothesize that, in addition to semantic diversity, the degree to which a story includes…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creativity, Computational Linguistics
Jing Ma – ProQuest LLC, 2024
This study investigated the impact of scoring polytomous items later on measurement precision, classification accuracy, and test security in mixed-format adaptive testing. Utilizing the shadow test approach, a simulation study was conducted across various test designs, lengths, number and location of polytomous item. Results showed that while…
Descriptors: Scoring, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stefan Ruseti; Ionut Paraschiv; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2024
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is a well-studied problem in Natural Language Processing applied in education. Solutions vary from handcrafted linguistic features to large Transformer-based models, implying a significant effort in feature extraction and model implementation. We introduce a novel Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) pipeline…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Essays
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stefan Ruseti; Ionut Paraschiv; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is a well-studied problem in Natural Language Processing applied in education. Solutions vary from handcrafted linguistic features to large Transformer-based models, implying a significant effort in feature extraction and model implementation. We introduce a novel Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) pipeline…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Essays
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mathias Benedek; Roger E. Beaty – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
The PISA assessment 2022 of creative thinking was a moonshot effort that introduced significant advancements over existing creativity tests, including a broad range of domains (written, visual, social, and scientific), implementation in many languages, and sophisticated scoring methods. PISA 2022 demonstrated the general feasibility of assessing…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Tests, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wallace N. Pinto Jr.; Jinnie Shin – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In recent years, the application of explainability techniques to automated essay scoring and automated short-answer grading (ASAG) models, particularly those based on transformer architectures, has gained significant attention. However, the reliability and consistency of these techniques remain underexplored. This study systematically investigates…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rebecka Weegar; Peter Idestam-Almquist – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Machine learning methods can be used to reduce the manual workload in exam grading, making it possible for teachers to spend more time on other tasks. However, when it comes to grading exams, fully eliminating manual work is not yet possible even with very accurate automated grading, as any grading mistakes could have significant consequences for…
Descriptors: Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Introductory Courses, Computer Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wen Xin Zhang; John J. H. Lin; Ying-Shao Hsu – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background Study: Assessing learners' inquiry-based skills is challenging as social, political, and technological dimensions must be considered. The advanced development of artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible to address these challenges and shape the next generation of science education. Objectives: The present study evaluated the SSI…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing, Inquiry, Active Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sami Baral; Eamon Worden; Wen-Chiang Lim; Zhuang Luo; Christopher Santorelli; Ashish Gurung; Neil Heffernan – Grantee Submission, 2024
The effectiveness of feedback in enhancing learning outcomes is well documented within Educational Data Mining (EDM). Various prior research have explored methodologies to enhance the effectiveness of feedback to students in various ways. Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their utility in enhancing automated…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cathy Cavanaugh; Bryn Humphrey; Paige Pullen – International Journal on E-Learning, 2024
To address needs in one US state to provide a professional development micro-credential for tens of thousands of educators, we automated an assignment scoring workflow in an online course by developing and refining an AI model to scan submitted assignments and score them against a rubric. This article outlines the AI model development process and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Scoring, Microcredentials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Tri Sedya Febrianti; Siti Fatimah; Yuni Fitriyah; Hanifah Nurhayati – International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2024
Assessing students' understanding of circle-related material through subjective tests is effective, though grading these tests can be challenging and often requires technological support. ChatGPT has shown promise in providing reliable and objective evaluations. Many teachers in Indonesia, however, continue to face difficulties integrating…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Tests
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3