Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 17 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 115 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 257 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 426 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 635 |
| Scoring | 514 |
| Test Construction | 120 |
| Test Items | 120 |
| Foreign Countries | 115 |
| Evaluation Methods | 106 |
| Automation | 100 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 97 |
| Essays | 90 |
| Student Evaluation | 90 |
| Scores | 89 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Australia | 13 |
| China | 12 |
| New York | 9 |
| Japan | 8 |
| Canada | 7 |
| Netherlands | 7 |
| Germany | 6 |
| Iran | 6 |
| Taiwan | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 6 |
| Spain | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mingfeng Xue; Yunting Liu; Xingyao Xiao; Mark Wilson – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Prompts play a crucial role in eliciting accurate outputs from large language models (LLMs). This study examines the effectiveness of an automatic prompt engineering (APE) framework for automatic scoring in educational measurement. We collected constructed-response data from 930 students across 11 items and used human scores as the true labels. A…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Prompting, Educational Assessment, Automation
Ikkyu Choi; Matthew S. Johnson – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Automated scoring systems provide multiple benefits but also pose challenges, notably potential bias. Various methods exist to evaluate these algorithms and their outputs for bias. Upon detecting bias, the next logical step is to investigate its cause, often by examining feature distributions. Recently, Johnson and McCaffrey proposed an…
Descriptors: Prediction, Bias, Automation, Scoring
Casabianca, Jodi M.; Donoghue, John R.; Shin, Hyo Jeong; Chao, Szu-Fu; Choi, Ikkyu – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Using item-response theory to model rater effects provides an alternative solution for rater monitoring and diagnosis, compared to using standard performance metrics. In order to fit such models, the ratings data must be sufficiently connected in order to estimate rater effects. Due to popular rating designs used in large-scale testing scenarios,…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Alternative Assessment, Evaluators, Research Problems
Ormerod, Christopher; Lottridge, Susan; Harris, Amy E.; Patel, Milan; van Wamelen, Paul; Kodeswaran, Balaji; Woolf, Sharon; Young, Mackenzie – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2023
We introduce a short answer scoring engine made up of an ensemble of deep neural networks and a Latent Semantic Analysis-based model to score short constructed responses for a large suite of questions from a national assessment program. We evaluate the performance of the engine and show that the engine achieves above-human-level performance on a…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Artificial Intelligence, Semantics
Dhini, Bachriah Fatwa; Girsang, Abba Suganda; Sufandi, Unggul Utan; Kurniawati, Heny – Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 2023
Purpose: The authors constructed an automatic essay scoring (AES) model in a discussion forum where the result was compared with scores given by human evaluators. This research proposes essay scoring, which is conducted through two parameters, semantic and keyword similarities, using a SentenceTransformers pre-trained model that can construct the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Writing Evaluation, Essays
Doewes, Afrizal; Pechenizkiy, Mykola – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2021
Scoring essays is generally an exhausting and time-consuming task for teachers. Automated Essay Scoring (AES) facilitates the scoring process to be faster and more consistent. The most logical way to assess the performance of an automated scorer is by measuring the score agreement with the human raters. However, we provide empirical evidence that…
Descriptors: Man Machine Systems, Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Luyang Fang; Gyeonggeon Lee; Xiaoming Zhai – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Machine learning-based automatic scoring faces challenges with imbalanced student responses across scoring categories. To address this, we introduce a novel text data augmentation framework that leverages GPT-4, a generative large language model specifically tailored for imbalanced datasets in automatic scoring. Our experimental dataset consisted…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Scoring
Chan, Kinnie Kin Yee; Bond, Trevor; Yan, Zi – Language Testing, 2023
We investigated the relationship between the scores assigned by an Automated Essay Scoring (AES) system, the Intelligent Essay Assessor (IEA), and grades allocated by trained, professional human raters to English essay writing by instigating two procedures novel to written-language assessment: the logistic transformation of AES raw scores into…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Essays, Scoring, Scores
Ramnarain-Seetohul, Vidasha; Bassoo, Vandana; Rosunally, Yasmine – Education and Information Technologies, 2022
In automated essay scoring (AES) systems, similarity techniques are used to compute the score for student answers. Several methods to compute similarity have emerged over the years. However, only a few of them have been widely used in the AES domain. This work shows the findings of a ten-year review on similarity techniques applied in AES systems…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Essays, Scoring, Automation
Selcuk Acar; Peter Organisciak; Denis Dumas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In this three-study investigation, we applied various approaches to score drawings created in response to both Form A and Form B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural (broadly TTCT-F) as well as the Multi-Trial Creative Ideation task (MTCI). We focused on TTCT-F in Study 1, and utilizing a random forest classifier, we achieved 79% and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Models, Correlation
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Olivera-Aguilar, Margarita; Lee, Hee-Sun; Pallant, Amy; Belur, Vinetha; Mulholland, Matthew; Liu, Ou Lydia – ETS Research Report Series, 2022
This study uses a computerized formative assessment system that provides automated scoring and feedback to help students write scientific arguments in a climate change curriculum. We compared the effect of contextualized versus generic automated feedback on students' explanations of scientific claims and attributions of uncertainty to those…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Formative Evaluation, Automation, Scoring
Swapna Haresh Teckwani; Amanda Huee-Ping Wong; Nathasha Vihangi Luke; Ivan Cherh Chiet Low – Advances in Physiology Education, 2024
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, has significantly impacted the educational landscape, offering unique opportunities for learning and assessment. In the realm of written assessment grading, traditionally viewed as a laborious and subjective process, this study sought to…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Reliability, Computational Linguistics, Standards
Wesley Morris; Langdon Holmes; Joon Suh Choi; Scott Crossley – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2025
Recent developments in the field of artificial intelligence allow for improved performance in the automated assessment of extended response items in mathematics, potentially allowing for the scoring of these items cheaply and at scale. This study details the grand prize-winning approach to developing large language models (LLMs) to automatically…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Mathematics Tests, Scoring
Zhang, Haoran; Litman, Diane – Grantee Submission, 2020
While automated essay scoring (AES) can reliably grade essays at scale, automated writing evaluation (AWE) additionally provides formative feedback to guide essay revision. However, a neural AES typically does not provide useful feature representations for supporting AWE. This paper presents a method for linking AWE and neural AES, by extracting…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Essay Tests, Writing Evaluation

Peer reviewed
Direct link
