NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Pell Grant Program1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 79 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tahereh Firoozi; Hamid Mohammadi; Mark J. Gierl – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate a multilingual automated essay scoring (AES) system for grading essays in three languages. Two different sentence embedding models were evaluated within the AES system, multilingual BERT (mBERT) and language-agnostic BERT sentence embedding (LaBSE). German, Italian, and Czech essays were…
Descriptors: College Students, Slavic Languages, German, Italian
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
McCaffrey, Daniel F.; Casabianca, Jodi M.; Ricker-Pedley, Kathryn L.; Lawless, René R.; Wendler, Cathy – ETS Research Report Series, 2022
This document describes a set of best practices for developing, implementing, and maintaining the critical process of scoring constructed-response tasks. These practices address both the use of human raters and automated scoring systems as part of the scoring process and cover the scoring of written, spoken, performance, or multimodal responses.…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Scoring, Test Format, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wen Xin Zhang; John J. H. Lin; Ying-Shao Hsu – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background Study: Assessing learners' inquiry-based skills is challenging as social, political, and technological dimensions must be considered. The advanced development of artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible to address these challenges and shape the next generation of science education. Objectives: The present study evaluated the SSI…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing, Inquiry, Active Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Doewes, Afrizal; Kurdhi, Nughthoh Arfawi; Saxena, Akrati – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2023
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) tools aim to improve the efficiency and consistency of essay scoring by using machine learning algorithms. In the existing research work on this topic, most researchers agree that human-automated score agreement remains the benchmark for assessing the accuracy of machine-generated scores. To measure the performance of…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing Evaluation, Evaluators, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
On-Soon Lee – Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 2024
Despite the increasing interest in using AI tools as assistant agents in instructional settings, the effectiveness of ChatGPT, the generative pretrained AI, for evaluating the accuracy of second language (L2) writing has been largely unexplored in formative assessment. Therefore, the current study aims to examine how ChatGPT, as an evaluator,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Uysal, Ibrahim; Dogan, Nuri – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2021
Scoring constructed-response items can be highly difficult, time-consuming, and costly in practice. Improvements in computer technology have enabled automated scoring of constructed-response items. However, the application of automated scoring without an investigation of test equating can lead to serious problems. The goal of this study was to…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Item Response Theory, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Parker, Mark A. J.; Hedgeland, Holly; Jordan, Sally E.; Braithwaite, Nicholas St. J. – European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2023
The study covers the development and testing of the alternative mechanics survey (AMS), a modified force concept inventory (FCI), which used automatically marked free-response questions. Data were collected over a period of three academic years from 611 participants who were taking physics classes at high school and university level. A total of…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Scientific Concepts, Physics, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schack, Edna O.; Dueber, David; Thomas, Jonathan Norris; Fisher, Molly H.; Jong, Cindy – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2019
Scoring of teachers' noticing responses is typically burdened with rater bias and reliance upon interrater consensus. The authors sought to make the scoring process more objective, equitable, and generalizable. The development process began with a description of response characteristics for each professional noticing component disconnected from…
Descriptors: Models, Teacher Evaluation, Observation, Bias
Jiyeo Yun – English Teaching, 2023
Studies on automatic scoring systems in writing assessments have also evaluated the relationship between human and machine scores for the reliability of automated essay scoring systems. This study investigated the magnitudes of indices for inter-rater agreement and discrepancy, especially regarding human and machine scoring, in writing assessment.…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Interrater Reliability, Essays, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Swapna Haresh Teckwani; Amanda Huee-Ping Wong; Nathasha Vihangi Luke; Ivan Cherh Chiet Low – Advances in Physiology Education, 2024
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, has significantly impacted the educational landscape, offering unique opportunities for learning and assessment. In the realm of written assessment grading, traditionally viewed as a laborious and subjective process, this study sought to…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Reliability, Computational Linguistics, Standards
Beula M. Magimairaj; Philip Capin; Sandra L. Gillam; Sharon Vaughn; Greg Roberts; Anna-Maria Fall; Ronald B. Gillam – Grantee Submission, 2022
Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the online administered format of the Test of Narrative Language--Second Edition (TNL-2; Gillam & Pearson, 2017), given the importance of assessing children's narrative ability and considerable absence of psychometric studies of spoken language assessments administered online.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Story Telling, Language Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Isler, Cemre; Aydin, Belgin – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2021
This study is about the development and validation process of the Computerized Oral Proficiency Test of English as a Foreign Language (COPTEFL). The test aims at assessing the speaking proficiency levels of students in Anadolu University School of Foreign Languages (AUSFL). For this purpose, three monologic tasks were developed based on the Global…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Construct Validity, Interrater Reliability, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gauns Dessai, Kissan G.; Kamat, Venkatesh V. – International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2018
Educational institutions worldwide conduct summative examinations to evaluate academic performance of students. Such summative examinations are normally subjective in nature in higher education institutions and needs manual evaluation. However, the manual evaluation of subjective answer-scripts often suffers from evaluation anomalies and the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Scoring Rubrics, Error Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wind, Stefanie A.; Wolfe, Edward W.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Foltz, Peter; Rosenstein, Mark – International Journal of Testing, 2018
Automated essay scoring engines (AESEs) are becoming increasingly popular as an efficient method for performance assessments in writing, including many language assessments that are used worldwide. Before they can be used operationally, AESEs must be "trained" using machine-learning techniques that incorporate human ratings. However, the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Essay Tests, Writing Evaluation, Scoring
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6