Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 5 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
| Predictor Variables | 5 |
| College Students | 3 |
| Online Courses | 3 |
| Student Attitudes | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| COVID-19 | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Active Learning in Higher… | 1 |
| Education and Information… | 1 |
| European Journal of… | 1 |
| International Association for… | 1 |
| Journal of Academic Ethics | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Postsecondary Education | 5 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tiana P. Johnson-Clements; Guy J. Curtis; Joseph Clare – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
Concerns over students engaging in various forms of academic misconduct persist, especially with the post-COVID-19 rise in online learning and assessment. Research has demonstrated a clear role of the personality trait psychopathy in cheating, yet little is known about why this relationship exists. Building on the research by Curtis et al.…
Descriptors: Pandemics, COVID-19, Cheating, Electronic Learning
Necati Taskin; Mehmet Kokoç – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
This study examines the growing issue of academic dishonesty in online assessments, a challenge intensified by the expansion of digital learning platforms. Specifically, it investigates the relationship between students' online engagement and their performance in online versus traditional paper-and-pencil tests. Employing a cross-sectional…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Computer Assisted Testing, Technology Uses in Education
Morales-Martinez, Guadalupe Elizabeth; Lopez-Ramirez, Ernesto Octavio; Mezquita-Hoyos, Yanko Norberto; Lopez-Perez, Rafael; Resendiz, Ana Yolanda Lara – European Journal of Educational Research, 2019
A sample of 327 engineering bachelor students from a public university in Mexico took part in an information integration study to explore systematic thinking underlying propensity for cheating during a course exam. All study participants were provided with written descriptions of 12 scenarios pertaining to the academic evaluation criteria and were…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing
Wielicki, Tom – International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2016
This paper reports on longitudinal study regarding integrity of testing in an online format as used by e-learning platforms. Specifically, this study explains whether online testing, which implies an open book format is compromising integrity of assessment by encouraging cheating among students. Statistical experiment designed for this study…
Descriptors: Integrity, Online Courses, Statistical Surveys, Longitudinal Studies
Beck, Victoria – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2014
Much has been written about student and faculty opinions on academic integrity in testing. Currently, concerns appear to focus more narrowly on online testing, generally based on anecdotal assumptions that online students are more likely to engage in academic dishonesty in testing than students in traditional on-campus courses. To address such…
Descriptors: College Students, College Faculty, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes

Peer reviewed
Direct link
