Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 7 |
Psychometrics | 7 |
Timed Tests | 7 |
Adaptive Testing | 2 |
Cognitive Ability | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
Guessing (Tests) | 2 |
Reaction Time | 2 |
Test Construction | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Ability Identification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
Journal of Intelligence | 1 |
Learning Disability Quarterly | 1 |
Online Submission | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
California Achievement Tests | 1 |
Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schmitz, Florian; Wilhelm, Oliver – Journal of Intelligence, 2019
Current taxonomies of intelligence comprise two factors of mental speed, clerical speed (Gs), and elementary cognitive speed (Gt). Both originated from different research traditions and are conceptualized as dissociable constructs in current taxonomies. However, previous research suggests that tasks of one category can be transferred into the…
Descriptors: Taxonomy, Intelligence Tests, Testing, Test Format
Beaujean, A. Alexander; Knoop, Andrew; Holliday, Gregory – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2006
The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if a single math-based chronometric task could accurately discriminate between college students with and without a diagnosed math disorder. Analyzing data from 31 students (6 in the case group, 25 in the clinical comparison group), it was found that the single chronometric task could accurately…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, College Students, Predictor Variables, Educational Diagnosis
Alderton, David L. – 1990
This paper highlights the need for a systematic, content aware, and theoretically-based approach to test design. The cognitive components approach is endorsed, and is applied to the development of a computerized perceptual speed test. Psychometric literature is reviewed and shows that: every major multi-factor theory includes a clerical/perceptual…
Descriptors: Adults, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Military Personnel
Making Use of Response Times in Standardized Tests: Are Accuracy and Speed Measuring the Same Thing?
Scrams, David J.; Schnipke, Deborah L. – 1997
Response accuracy and response speed provide separate measures of performance. Psychometricians have tended to focus on accuracy with the goal of characterizing examinees on the basis of their ability to respond correctly to items from a given content domain. With the advent of computerized testing, response times can now be recorded unobtrusively…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory, Psychometrics
Wise, Steven L.; Bhola, Dennison S.; Yang, Sheng-Ta – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2006
The attractiveness of computer-based tests (CBTs) is due largely to their capability to expand the ways we conduct testing. A relatively unexplored application, however, is actively using the computer to reduce construct-irrelevant variance while a test is being administered. This investigation introduces the effort-monitoring CBT, in which the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Validity, Reaction Time, Guessing (Tests)
Slater, Sharon C.; Schaeffer, Gary A. – 1996
The General Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) of the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) includes three operational sections that are separately timed and scored. A "no score" is reported if the examinee answers fewer than 80% of the items or if the examinee does not answer all of the items and leaves the section before time expires. The 80%…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Equal Education
Rizavi, Saba; Hariharan, Swaminathan – Online Submission, 2001
The advantages that computer adaptive testing offers over linear tests have been well documented. The Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) design is more efficient than the Linear test design as fewer items are needed to estimate an examinee's proficiency to a desired level of precision. In the ideal situation, a CAT will result in examinees answering…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Test Construction, Test Length, Computer Assisted Testing