Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 25 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 79 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 79 |
Selection | 79 |
Test Items | 74 |
Simulation | 30 |
Test Construction | 23 |
Item Banks | 22 |
Comparative Analysis | 21 |
Ability | 16 |
Item Response Theory | 15 |
Algorithms | 12 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gorgun, Guher; Bulut, Okan – Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2023
In low-stakes assessment settings, students' performance is not only influenced by students' ability level but also their test-taking engagement. In computerized adaptive tests (CATs), disengaged responses (e.g., rapid guesses) that fail to reflect students' true ability levels may lead to the selection of less informative items and thereby…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Chen, Chia-Wen; Wang, Wen-Chung; Chiu, Ming Ming; Ro, Sage – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
The use of computerized adaptive testing algorithms for ranking items (e.g., college preferences, career choices) involves two major challenges: unacceptably high computation times (selecting from a large item pool with many dimensions) and biased results (enhanced preferences or intensified examinee responses because of repeated statements across…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Bao, Yu; Bradshaw, Laine – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018
Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) can provide multidimensional diagnostic feedback about students' mastery levels of knowledge components or attributes. One advantage of using DCMs is the ability to accurately and reliably classify students into mastery levels with a relatively small number of items per attribute. Combining DCMs with…
Descriptors: Test Items, Selection, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Carroll, Ian A. – ProQuest LLC, 2017
Item exposure control is, relative to adaptive testing, a nascent concept that has emerged only in the last two to three decades on an academic basis as a practical issue in high-stakes computerized adaptive tests. This study aims to implement a new strategy in item exposure control by incorporating the standard error of the ability estimate into…
Descriptors: Test Items, Computer Assisted Testing, Selection, Adaptive Testing
Sahin, Alper; Ozbasi, Durmus – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2017
Purpose: This study aims to reveal effects of content balancing and item selection method on ability estimation in computerized adaptive tests by comparing Fisher's maximum information (FMI) and likelihood weighted information (LWI) methods. Research Methods: Four groups of examinees (250, 500, 750, 1000) and a bank of 500 items with 10 different…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Test Content
He, Wei; Diao, Qi; Hauser, Carl – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
This study compared four item-selection procedures developed for use with severely constrained computerized adaptive tests (CATs). Severely constrained CATs refer to those adaptive tests that seek to meet a complex set of constraints that are often not conclusive to each other (i.e., an item may contribute to the satisfaction of several…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Test Items, Selection, Computer Assisted Testing
Cheng, Ying; Patton, Jeffrey M.; Shao, Can – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
a-Stratified computerized adaptive testing with b-blocking (AST), as an alternative to the widely used maximum Fisher information (MFI) item selection method, can effectively balance item pool usage while providing accurate latent trait estimates in computerized adaptive testing (CAT). However, previous comparisons of these methods have treated…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Yao, Lihua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014
The intent of this research was to find an item selection procedure in the multidimensional computer adaptive testing (CAT) framework that yielded higher precision for both the domain and composite abilities, had a higher usage of the item pool, and controlled the exposure rate. Five multidimensional CAT item selection procedures (minimum angle;…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
He, Wei; Diao, Qi; Hauser, Carl – Online Submission, 2013
This study compares the four existing procedures handling the item selection in severely constrained computerized adaptive tests (CAT). These procedures include weighted deviation model (WDM), weighted penalty model (WPM), maximum priority index (MPI), and shadow test approach (STA). Severely constrained CAT refer to those adaptive tests seeking…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Wang, Chun – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2014
Many latent traits in social sciences display a hierarchical structure, such as intelligence, cognitive ability, or personality. Usually a second-order factor is linearly related to a group of first-order factors (also called domain abilities in cognitive ability measures), and the first-order factors directly govern the actual item responses.…
Descriptors: Measurement, Accuracy, Item Response Theory, Adaptive Testing
Leroux, Audrey J.; Lopez, Myriam; Hembry, Ian; Dodd, Barbara G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
This study compares the progressive-restricted standard error (PR-SE) exposure control procedure to three commonly used procedures in computerized adaptive testing, the randomesque, Sympson-Hetter (SH), and no exposure control methods. The performance of these four procedures is evaluated using the three-parameter logistic model under the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Seo, Dong Gi; Weiss, David J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
Most computerized adaptive tests (CATs) have been studied using the framework of unidimensional item response theory. However, many psychological variables are multidimensional and might benefit from using a multidimensional approach to CATs. This study investigated the accuracy, fidelity, and efficiency of a fully multidimensional CAT algorithm…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Accuracy, Fidelity
Mao, Xiuzhen; Xin, Tao – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
The Monte Carlo approach which has previously been implemented in traditional computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is applied here to cognitive diagnostic CAT to test the ability of this approach to address multiple content constraints. The performance of the Monte Carlo approach is compared with the performance of the modified maximum global…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Cognitive Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Computer Assisted Testing
Hsu, Chia-Ling; Wang, Wen-Chung; Chen, Shu-Ying – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
Interest in developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) under cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) has increased recently. CAT algorithms that use a fixed-length termination rule frequently lead to different degrees of measurement precision for different examinees. Fixed precision, in which the examinees receive the same degree of measurement…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Cognitive Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Wang, Chun – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
Cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) purports to combine the strengths of both CAT and cognitive diagnosis. Cognitive diagnosis models aim at classifying examinees into the correct mastery profile group so as to pinpoint the strengths and weakness of each examinee whereas CAT algorithms choose items to determine those…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Cognitive Tests, Diagnostic Tests