Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 225 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1358 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2816 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4806 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 7203 |
| Foreign Countries | 2049 |
| Test Construction | 1110 |
| Student Evaluation | 1062 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1061 |
| Test Items | 1057 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1052 |
| Educational Technology | 904 |
| Comparative Analysis | 835 |
| Scores | 830 |
| Higher Education | 823 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 182 |
| Researchers | 146 |
| Teachers | 122 |
| Policymakers | 40 |
| Administrators | 36 |
| Students | 15 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
Location
| Australia | 169 |
| United Kingdom | 153 |
| Turkey | 126 |
| China | 117 |
| Germany | 108 |
| Canada | 106 |
| Spain | 94 |
| Taiwan | 89 |
| Netherlands | 73 |
| Iran | 71 |
| United States | 68 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 4 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
van der Linden, Wim J.; Veldkamp, Bernard P. – 2002
Item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing is implemented by imposing item-ineligibility constraints on the assembly process of the shadow tests. The method resembles J. Sympson and R. Hetter's (1985) method of item-exposure control in that the decisions to impose the constraints are probabilistic. However, the method does not require…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing, Law Schools
PDF pending restorationGreen, Bert F. – 2002
Maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimates of proficiency, typically used in adaptive testing, use item weights that depend on test taker proficiency to estimate test taker proficiency. In this study, several methods were explored through computer simulation using fixed item weights, which depend mainly on the items difficulty. The simpler scores…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Reese, Lynda M.; Schnipke, Deborah L. – 1999
A two-stage design provides a way of roughly adapting item difficulty to test-taker ability. All test takers take a parallel stage-one test, and based on their scores, they are routed to tests of different difficulty levels in the second stage. This design provides some of the benefits of standard computer adaptive testing (CAT), such as increased…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level
Plumer, Gilbert E. – 2000
In the context of examining the feasibility and advisability of computerizing the Law School Admission Test (LSAT), a review of current literature was conducted with the following goals: (1) determining the skills that are most important in good legal reasoning according to the literature; (2) determining the extent to which existing LSAT item…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing, Law Schools
van der Linden, Wim J.; Reese, Lynda M. – 2001
A model for constrained computerized adaptive testing is proposed in which the information on the test at the ability estimate is maximized subject to a large variety of possible constraints on the contents of the test. At each item-selection step, a full test is first assembled to have maximum information at the current ability estimate fixing…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing
Parshall, Cynthia G.; Kromrey, Jeffrey D.; Harmes, J. Christine; Sentovich, Christina – 2001
Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) are efficient because of their optimal item selection procedures that target maximally informative items at each estimated ability level. However, operational administration of these optimal CATs results in a relatively small subset of items given to examinees too often, while another portion of the item pool is…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)
Roussos, Louis; Nandakumar, Ratna; Cwikla, Julie – 2000
CATSIB is a differential item functioning (DIF) assessment methodology for computerized adaptive test (CAT) data. Kernel smoothing (KS) is a technique for nonparametric estimation of item response functions. In this study an attempt has been made to develop a more efficient DIF procedure for CAT data, KS-CATSIB, by combining CATSIB with kernel…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Bias, Item Response Theory
McLeod, Lori D.; Schnipke, Deborah L. – 1999
Because scores on high-stakes tests influence many decisions, tests need to be secure. Decisions based on scores affected by preknowledge of items are unacceptable. New methods are needed to detect the new cheating strategies used for computer-administered tests because item pools are typically used over time, providing the potential opportunity…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewedFulcher, Glenn – Language Testing, 2003
Describes a three-phase process model for interface design, drawing on practices developed in the software industry and adapting them for computer-based languages tests. Describes good practice in initial design, emphasizes the importance of usability testing, and argues that only through following a principled approach to interface design can the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software, Language Tests, Models
Peer reviewedThissen, David; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1989
An approach to scoring reading comprehension based on the concept of the testlet is described, using models developed for items in multiple categories. The model is illustrated using data from 3,866 examinees. Application of testlet scoring to multiple category models developed for individual items is discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedFaust, David; Ziskin, Jay – Computers in Human Behavior, 1989
Discussion of computer-assisted psychological evaluation focuses on its use as legal evidence. Topics discussed include legal criteria for expertise; clinical psychology and standards for expertise; factors relating to reliability and validity, including the proper use of data; computerized test administration; computer-based test interpretation;…
Descriptors: Clinical Psychology, Computer Assisted Testing, Court Litigation, Data Analysis
Peer reviewedAndrich, David – Psychometrika, 1995
This book discusses adapting pencil-and-paper tests to computerized testing. Mention is made of models for graded responses to items and of possibilities beyond pencil-and-paper-tests, but the book is essentially about dichotomously scored test items. Contrasts between item response theory and classical test theory are described. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory, Scores
Peer reviewedDodd, Barbara G.; Koch, William R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1994
Simulated data were used to investigate the impact of characteristics of threshold values (number, symmetry, and distance between adjacent threshold values) and delta values on the distribution of item information in the successive intervals Rasch model. Implications for computerized adaptive attitude measurement are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Attitude Measures, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedMacready, George B.; Dayton, C. Mitchell – Psychometrika, 1992
An adaptive testing algorithm is presented based on an alternative modeling framework, and its effectiveness is investigated in a simulation based on real data. The algorithm uses a latent class modeling framework in which assessed latent attributes are assumed to be categorical variables. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Bayesian Statistics, Classification
Peer reviewedOlsen, James B. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1990
Presents two studies applying computerized adaptive testing (CAT) in schools. Compared paper-administered, computer-administered, and CAT modes for administering school achievement and assessment tests. Then compared computerized adaptive aptitude test results with individually administered Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Found…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis


