Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 225 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1358 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2816 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4806 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 7203 |
| Foreign Countries | 2049 |
| Test Construction | 1110 |
| Student Evaluation | 1062 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1061 |
| Test Items | 1057 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1052 |
| Educational Technology | 904 |
| Comparative Analysis | 835 |
| Scores | 830 |
| Higher Education | 823 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 182 |
| Researchers | 146 |
| Teachers | 122 |
| Policymakers | 40 |
| Administrators | 36 |
| Students | 15 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
Location
| Australia | 169 |
| United Kingdom | 153 |
| Turkey | 126 |
| China | 117 |
| Germany | 108 |
| Canada | 106 |
| Spain | 94 |
| Taiwan | 89 |
| Netherlands | 73 |
| Iran | 71 |
| United States | 68 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 4 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Veldkamp, Bernard P.; van der Linden, Wim J. – 1999
A method of item pool design is proposed that uses an optimal blueprint for the item pool calculated from the test specifications. The blueprint is a document that specifies the attributes that the items in the computerized adaptive test (CAT) pool should have. The blueprint can be a starting point for the item writing process, and it can be used…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Classification, Computer Assisted Testing
Thompson, Tony D.; Davey, Tim – 1999
Methods to control the test construct and the efficiency of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) were studied in the context of a reading comprehension test given as a part of a battery of tests for college admission. A goal of the study was to create test scores that were interchangeable with those from a fixed form paper and pencil test. The first…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewedLeclercq, Dieudonne – European Journal of Education, 1980
Advancements in educational testing, especially in the computerized construction of tests from item banks, are outlined and explained. It is suggested that these methods open the door to more individualized and more formative type of testing. (MSE)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Oriented Programs, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedDirkzwager, A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1996
Testing with personal probabilities eliminates guessing whether the subjects are well calibrated. A probability testing study with 47 Dutch elementary school children who used an interactive computer program shows that even 11-year-olds can estimate their personal probabilities correctly. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewedHankins, Janette A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
The effects of a fixed and variable entry procedure on bias and information of a Bayesian adaptive test were compared. Neither procedure produced biased ability estimates on the average. Bias at the distribution extremes, efficiency curves, item subsets generated for administration, and items required to reach termination are discussed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedBaker, Frank B. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1990
Four articles on computer-assisted testing in schools at local and state levels are reviewed. Trends in the application of and limitations/advantages of microcomputerized testing packages are described. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Microcomputers
Peer reviewedSchuldberg, David – Computers in Human Behavior, 1988
Describes study that investigated the effects of computerized test administration on undergraduates' responses to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), and discusses methodological considerations important in evaluating the sensitivity of personality inventories in different administration formats. Results analyze the effects of…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewedJuhel, Jacques – Intelligence, 1991
Individual differences in performance on 4 computer-controlled visual memory and recognition tasks as a function of performance on 5 paper-and-pencil spatial tests were studied for 90 psychology students attending the University of Rennes (France). Results show that spatial thinking is partially supported by visual memory. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedKobak, Kenneth A.; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1993
A developed computer-administered form of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale and the clinician form of the instrument were administered to 214 psychiatric outpatients and 78 community adults. Results support the reliability and validity of the computer-administered version as an alternative to the clinician-administered version. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Anxiety, Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewedWoltz, Dan J.; Shute, Valerie J. – Intelligence, 1993
Two studies involving 274 Air Force recruits and 163 college students, respectively, investigated the relationship between priming effects and declarative knowledge acquisition within repetitive practice models. Individual differences in repetition-priming effects uniquely predicted learning differences relative to other cognitive measures.…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRussell, Michael; Haney, Walt – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2000
Summarizes recent developments in the use of technology in schools and state-level testing programs. Presents results of two studies, one with 114 students and one with about 200 students, that indicate that written tests administered on paper underestimate the achievement of students accustomed to working with computers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Technology, High School Students, High Schools
Cole, Jason C.; Lutkus, Anthony D. – Research in the Schools, 1997
A college administered the computer-adaptive ACCUPLACER (College Board, 1995) reading placement test to 399 entering students and its paper-and-pencil version, COMPANION, to 481 students. When the age of the two groups was held constant, no differences were found between the groups. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Age Differences, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedShermis, Mark D.; Mzumara, Howard R.; Bublitz, Scott T. – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2001
This study of undergraduates examined differences between computer adaptive testing (CAT) and self-adaptive testing (SAT), including feedback conditions and gender differences. Results of the Test Anxiety Inventory, Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and a Student Attitude Questionnaire showed measurement efficiency is differentially affected by test…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Anxiety, Computer Assisted Testing, Gender Issues
Li, Yuan H.; Schafer, William D. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2005
Under a multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) computerized adaptive testing (CAT) testing scenario, a trait estimate (theta) in one dimension will provide clues for subsequently seeking a solution in other dimensions. This feature may enhance the efficiency of MIRT CAT's item selection and its scoring algorithms compared with its…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Item Banks, Computation, Psychological Studies
Stock, Steven E.; Davies, Daniel K.; Wehmeyer, Michael L. – Journal of Special Education Technology, 2004
Assessment has always been an integral component of the educational process, but the importance to students of performing effectively on district and statewide tests has increased the visibility of testing and assessment for students with and without disabilities. There are several factors that limit the reliability of common testing formats for…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Mental Retardation, Adaptive Testing, Evaluation Methods

Direct link
